Analysis of an ongoing quality improvement

 

 

 

deliver an analysis of an ongoing quality improvement initiative in your workplace. The initiative you analyze must relate to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of your analysis is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your audience consists of nurses and selected health care professionals with specializations or interests in your selected condition, disease, or issue. You hope to inform and garner support for the initiative from your audience.
Instructions
• Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.
o Explain the rationale behind the QI improvement initiative. What prompted the initiative?
o Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative.

 

• Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.
o Analyze the benchmarks used to evaluate success. Which aspects of the initiative were most successful? What outcome measures are missing or could be added?
o Incorporate one appropriate supporting visual (such as a graph or chart) that showcases the most critical aspect of this presentation.
• Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.
• Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Who did you talk to? What are their professions? How did their perspectives impact your analysis?
• Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.
o Identify specific process or protocol changes as well as technologies that would improve quality outcomes.

 

 

Sample Solution

Despite the presence of feasible measures that may considerably cut mortality, poor quality of care is one of the reasons why death rates in many Sub-Saharan African (SSA) nations like Uganda remain unacceptably high. If the quality of care was improved, around 500,000 stillbirths and 1 million newborn deaths may be avoided. Health care delivery is decentralized to the local level in many SSA nations, such as Uganda, making the district health system responsible for the quality of care given. Quality improvement (QI) activities in healthcare have become mainstream [9], with a variety of methodologies being utilized, including Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) processes. CQI is a quality management technique that encourages all members of the health-care team to ask questions on a regular basis.

iscuss about the comparison between the organization cultural of military forces between the British army that help in counterinsurgency of Malaysia(Malaya) and U.S Army that help in Vietnam War. The organization culture can be defined as a decisive determinant in their effectiveness and hence help to determine the course of international politics. In simple words, the organization cultural of military forces can be defined as the ability of military organization to adapt or to change whether that change occurs in military technology and in the structure of the international system. This organization cultural are one of the main component of state’s ability to guarantee their own security and their allies. The point that will be discuss is about the evaluating the literature on military innovation. As for the British Army, the civilian leaders in Britain which had institutional incentives to act as a unit that had an easier time agreeing for both policy goals and oversight options to ensure that the British army followed these goal that been framed by the leader’s. By setting these goals, the British army will react more flexibility to change their mind set same as the civilian leader’s goals. In contra, as for the U.S Army, the civilian leaders in the United State army which have an institutional incentive to act separately and found it harder to agree on policy goals which often to choose more complex oversight mechanism and did not always induce the U.S Army to respond easily. Besides that, the British army officer’s response directly with their political master cabinet which this will create a improve way of flexible military. As for the American system, the military has the ability to “trade off” demands that made by the congress that against the president. From the argument that been elaborate, we can conclude that different in political system of the government will led the nation’s politicians to create different militaries. Besides, the critical independent variable is not the nature of the national government which has the most cases that has a little impact on which policies the military to adopt but it is the organization culture of the military institution that determine whether innovation of the military will succeed or fail for each country. The other point of comparison for this paragraph is

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.