Analysis of the Handmaid’s Tale

Incorporate at least six of the following elements (1-12) but use more if relevant to your novel. (These
should be integrated into your overall analysis and not isolated as distinct sections in your paper.)
FORM, STRUCTURE, AND PLOT: How is the novel organized? Length? Chapters? Only note these things
if they are significant in some way. Discuss techniques such as flashbacks or dream sequences, stream of
consciousness, chronological order of events, foreshadowing, parallel events, multiple, complex, or simple
plot. How much time is covered? Compare and contrast beginning and ending.
POINT OF VIEW: (Narrative Perspective) Is the novel written from first person (“I”), second person (“you”),
or third person (he/she)? Is it a reminiscence or recent perspective written in the present tense or the past
tense? If in the first person, is he/she the protagonists or an observer? If in third, is he/she omniscient
(knowing everything), limited omniscient (knowing one character most often) or objective (no subjective
Are there any shifts in point of view during the novel?
(Shifts might come from the changed view(s) of the narrator or from different narrators.) What effect does
the author achieve with point of view and what seems to be his/her purpose?
CHARACTER: General comments: flat/round? Static/dynamic? Believable? How are they revealed? How
complex? How many? Protagonist/antagonist? Role of minor characters? Then describe 4-6 central
characters: name, age, three descriptive adjectives, appearance, personality, function in novel, significance
of name, a key quote that reveals character with an explanation of what the quote reveals. Be careful to not
just label the characters with literary terms (“He is round; she is flat!”) but look deeply into who the character
is and what is the author’s purpose in employing that character in the novel.
SETTING: Where and when does the novel occur? How is the environment described? Any symbolic
meanings in the setting? How does the author use setting? What atmosphere is created by the setting?
How important is setting to the novel?
DICTION: Analyze the author’s word choices. First discuss the work in general: is the diction informal,
formal, neutral? Explain and give an example. Does the author use much imagery? Metaphoric and/or ironic
devices? Is the language plain? Flowery? Concise? Strong? Lyrical? Does diction indicate social status,
education, region? How much dialogue is used? How different is the dialogue from the narrative voice?
How distinct is the dialogue from character to character? Select passages featuring different plot segments.
Copy the segments and include in your response. Closely read the passages, then discuss, specifically, the
diction. Comment on how diction helps define character, set tone, further theme, etc.
SYNTAX: (word order, pattern) Analysis of sentence and phrase patterns. Make some general
observations: Are the sentences predominately simple or complex? What about length? Level of formality?
Any fragments? Rhetorical questions? Parallel structure? Repetitions? Is there much variety to the
sentence pattern? How does the author use syntax to create rhythm and flow of the language? How does
the author use syntax to enhance effect and support meaning? Comment on how these choices help define
character, set tone, further theme, etc.
CONCRETE DETAIL/IMAGERY: Words or phrases that appeal to the five senses – most commonly visual.
Look for recurrent images. What function does the imagery seem to have? Use direct quotations from the
text to support your observations.

Sample Solution

For one, Sassoon is noted to have perused and been affected by Edward Carpenter’s The Intermediate Sex. In spite of the fact that this intertextual reference requires the peruser to be acquainted with Carpenter’s work on homosexuality, it likewise permits Barker to imply Sassoon’s own homosexuality without unequivocally expressing so. Or maybe Sassoon takes note of that the content ‘spared’ his life and gave him he ‘wasn’t only an oddity’ for not feeling ‘the things you should feel’ , an understood inference to his homosexuality that is strengthened when River’s cautions him that there are individuals who will utilize ‘a man’s private life to ruin his perspectives’ . While River’s beforehand urges Sassoon to recuperate his subdued war recollections, interestingly, his homosexuality is believed to be best kept quelled.

Sassoon isn’t the main patient urged to curb his sexuality in any case, individual artist Wilfred Owen is as well. While Elaine Showalter takes note of that Owen and Sassoon are nevertheless two gay writers renowned for war verse, Richard Frein recommends that their ‘war verse has the incendiary propensity to be our ages love verse’ , featuring one of the incredible Catch 22s of the war in which the ‘most severe of contentions’ sets up a ‘household’ or ‘mindful’ connection among officials and men that frequently expanded farther than just comradery.

While Barker utilizes the chronicled novel to investigate the impacts of war on men, Water’s puts ‘ladies’ interests’ at the front line and centers upon the ladies abandoned by the war and the gay connections they created between themselves. Pundit Natasha Alden recommends that Waters goes astray from the ‘widespread’ delineation of gay ladies as ‘cursed by devastating self-loathing and dread’ and opposes reverberating the ‘clear hopelessness that being gay gets fiction’ . Rather Water’s gives an elective consummation of gay ladies that doesn’t bring about death or hetero marriage. While Waters carefully reproduces the period detail of the 1940’s, obvious in her considerable rundown of ‘Affirmations’, she uniquely alters out a great part of the hopelessness brought about by living stealthily, an exclusion that challenges past got forms of history. For Waters approaches homosexuality with a disposition like the one Lillian Faderman recognizes as predominant come the finish of the war, that is ‘even ladies who didn’t distinguish themselves as lesbians in the military would in general treat lesbianism… with a ‘who cares?’ mentality’ . This disposition is likewise epitomized by Kay whom derides Helen for stressing t

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.