Analyzing an ethical case

at
Categories
Tags

As technology impacts most aspects of our lives, it also affects the way we respond to death, and mourn. Not too many years ago, for example people grieving after a death didn’t have to worry about memorializing loved ones’ social media accounts, about including “digital assets” in a will, about being painfully reminded of their loss by a company’s well-intended but ill-considered “engagement” efforts, or about potentially losing treasure troves of memories if a photo hosting platform shut down.

The sadness is as old as the world, but people, through technology, respond to it in new ways. One such recent development is the creation of “griefbots.” An article titled “The Griefbot that Could Change How We Mourn” details in particular the work of a data scientist, Muhammad Ahmad, who hopes that artificial intelligence will “eventually allow us to craft the data left behind by an individual into convincing text-based simulations of that person. “Such simulations would “respond when prompted, imitating the deceased’s intonation, tone, and idiosyncrasies.”

Ahmad has been working on his own “griefbot.” The project was a response to a personal loss—the death of his father. It is an effort to reclaim (or continue) interactivity with someone who has died. Beyond the interaction with those who knew the deceased, however, Ahmad also envisions a kind of interactivity that would span generations: When his father died four years ago, Ahmad lamented the fact that any future children he would have would never be able to bond with their grandfather. He drew on his previous research, … and spent the last few years collecting data his father had left behind, such as audio or video recordings, text messages, and transcripts of letters. This information has allowed him to create a messenger program that (he claims) can imitate his father. …

Ahmad now has a 2-year-old daughter, and as he continues to evolve his simulation (he’s currently exploring how to enable it respond to images and adapt to new contexts), he hopes that one day she’ll form the appearance of a connection with her grandfather.

Is the development of “grief bots” ethical? Justify your answer using the philosophical lens.

Sample Solution

Christian Revelation

“The issue uncovered in Christian philosophy is at last a definitive source and standard of religious philosophy itself …” This announcement examines the connection between the lessons of Christian disclosure and its philosophical practice It is a decent beginning stage for you. As these words recommend, there are basically entwined characteristics between the two ideas, all the more explicitly the reliance of Christian religious philosophy on disclosure, and comprehension of this disclosure through philosophical conduct.

“Since I comprehend Christian religion, it is an antiquated time, it is a disclosure, yet the blend of a huge number of legends, stories, legends, and Jewish and Christian disclosures, It made it the best religion John Adams composed a letter to FA Van der Kamp on December 27, 1816.

Christianity is a monotheism of Abraham and is currently the biggest religion on the planet. It created from a gathering of Jewish devotees of the first century CE. Christians declares the cases expressed in a progression of standardizing writings, including the Old Testament, which incorporates the writings acquired from Judaism, and the New Testament, which incorporates Matthew ‘s Gospel, Mark, Luca and John. What’s more, the narrative of John). The exercises of Jesus, just as the occasions and lessons of the early Christian church (eg biblical discourse, Paul’s letter) and end of the world, finish of life prediction

The second piece of Christian verse is the New Testament. It contains the disclosure and lessons of Jesus and the messengers. As far as I could possibly know, all Christians isolate the content of the New Testament into 27 books. Be that as it may, the request for these 27 books is distinctive in the Orthodox, Roman Catholics, and Protestant customs. Unauthenticated written work incorporates Judith, Maccabees, and different books. The Jews didn’t see Apocrypha as a major aspect of Tanak. A few Christians think Apocrypha is a piece of the Bible, yet I trust it isn’t so. The Christian Bible, including Biblical books, makes them three unique creations: between the Old Testament and the New Testament, toward the finish of the New Testament, and in the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Scriptural Christianity accepts that the Old Testament and the New Testament of the Bible are expressions of God’s disclosure and are the main legitimate confidence and practice standard. The Bible cautions of joining the Word of God (Revelation 22: 18); Christians dismiss the Quran as an endeavor in God’s Word, and from multiple points of view as a report opposing to the Bible. Muslims show professional based help, and consequently looks like other counterfeit religions like this. He should admit to Shahada (“Besides Allaah, not God, Muhammad is his prophet”), he needed to adore Mecca five times each day, he said that year (Ramadan) During that period fasting, he should offer cash to poor people, he should go to Mecca for explorers anyplace in his life. Islam reveals to us that the day of judgment will adjust between goo

This question has been answered.

Get Answer