Ancient Political Theory

 

 

 

Research Question: According to St. Thomas Aquinas, what and how is a ruler and government considered a just ruler or government?

Possible topics to address: virtue, theory of human nature, education, constitutions/types of government, religion and politics, leadership (good and bad), etc.

Describe what the political theorist says on your chosen topic and analyze his/her argument. In your thesis, create an argument with 2 or 3 points about the political theorist’s thinking and argue why the political philosophy is essential, unique, correct, or wrong. The paper focuses on the political thinkers’ argument, not contemporary issues.

Explain in detail and support your argument and analysis with details with 2/3 primary (the political theorist’s original work) and the rest secondary sources (scholarly commentary from books and peer-reviewed journal articles).

 

 

 

Sample Solution

St. Thomas Aquinas believed that a just ruler or government exists when it is grounded on the principles of virtue, human nature, and education (Balsano & Mitchell, 2015). Aquinas argued that people should be ruled by those with moral wisdom, which can only be acquired through an understanding of the theory of human nature. He also stressed that a good ruler must possess prudence to make proper decisions and right judgment in order to provide justice for all citizens (Aquinas 1293–1294). In addition to relying on virtuous leaders, Aquinas proposed several types of governments – including monarchy, aristocracy and democracy – each with their own set of rules regarding leadership selection and decision making processes (Balsano & Mitchell 2015).

Aquinas also argued for the importance of religious values in politics. According to him, religion was necessary for upholding morality in society since it provides stability against corruption and inspires people towards acts of charity as well as moral behavior (Aquinas 1295-1296). He further suggested that there should exist a separation between church and state so as not interfere with one another’s respective activities but rather complement each other’s efforts in promoting morality. Finally he emphasized the need for both rulers and the ruled alike to pursue educational opportunities such as reading books or studying philosophy so they may acquire knowledge which will help them better understand how to conduct themselves politically (Aquinas 1298-1302).

In conclusion then we can see how St. Thomas Aquinas viewed just rulers or governments as those founded upon virtue, theory of human nature and education; further these governments should be based on religious values while avoiding any conflation between spiritual matters and political affairs. Furthermore, if citizens are encouraged towards seeking out educational opportunities this could lead to greater understanding amongst all parties involved thereby helping create more equitable societies where justice prevails regardless of background or status.

 

 

 

The Revenger’s Tragedy

Misfortune of Avengers What sort of misfortune is this? By definition, the misfortune is “a staggering, excruciating, dismal occasion”. Notwithstanding, the awfulness of Avengers doesn’t uncover every one of these highlights. It is frightful and abnormal, loaded with wicked, brutal, dead and maniacal grisly clarifications, however this is certainly not a dismal story. Instead of cause the crowd to feel distress, they regularly draw mind blowing doubtful feelings. The reason for the misfortune isn’t inefficient sorrow, however to utilize retaliation as a persuading intends to cause contempt.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the retribution of the renaissance (“misfortune of vengeance”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare confounds the essential retribution plot by making three vengeance plots. By including significant advancements, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their essential topic and shows are comparable, the two plays show a differentiating picture of vengeance; rather than “Vindicator’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment restricted by the creator’s social data and lacking

The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution dramatization, vengeance show or grisly misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and retribution. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution show”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of renowned retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).

 

 

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.