Anime was a mistake

at
Categories
Tags

 

Miyzaki’s misquote “Anime was a mistake” is a reference to his belief that otaku culture that produces anime today is created by
“people who hate interacting with people.” Previous generations of animators were artists trained in other disciplines such as medicine, political science and
economics. Miyazaki claims that the anime of today is not grounded in reality because animators base their stories and themes on references to previous
anime works. Note that he is not saying anime cannot have fantasy or science fiction elements, many of his works include these, but he’s saying that
characters, situations and emotions are no longer grounded in reality and that’s led to a drop in the quality and appeal of Japanese animation.
1. Do you agree or disagree with Miyazaki’s sentiment? Explain why in detail with examples from your own experience with anime.
2. Do you think the anime you watched in class reinforces Miyazaki’s opinion or opposes it? Explain with specific examples from the anime.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer