Appearance/possessions Compliments

 

Please write a short literature review about compliments for the categories listed below. Sources have been provided. You can use the abstracts of the articles for content of each compliment category.
1. Appearance/possessions
– Kahalon, R., Becker, J. C., & Shnabel, N. (2022). Appearance comments presented as compliments at work: How are they perceived by targets and observers in and outside of workplace settings? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(8), 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12732

– Lin, L., Roberge, A., & Flynn, M. A. (2020). Appearance-based praise and criticism: does the source matter? Communication Research Reports, 37(4), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1796616

 

Sample Solution

Appearance/possessions compliments are social interactions that focus on a person’s physical characteristics or material items they own. Various studies have examined the affect of these types of compliments and the perceptions of both those receiving them as well as observers. For instance, Kahalon et al (2022) found that women tend to perceive compliments regarding their appearance more negatively than men when they come from people outside the workplace. Additionally, Lin et al (2020) discovered that comments on physical attributes coming from strangers were generally seen as less appropriate than such remarks made by friends or family members.

Furthermore, there appears to be an interesting gender dynamic related to this topic since research indicates that women often expect praise for accomplishments while men receive it more readily for their appearance/possessions (Kahalon et al 2022). This suggests that perhaps women face greater pressure to look a certain way which could lead to negative repercussions if those expectations are not met. However, further study is needed in order to better understand whether this phenomena holds true across different age groups and cultural contexts.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.