Application: Process Recordings

 

 

 

 

A process recording is a written tool field education experience students, field instructors, and faculty use to examine the dynamics of social work
interactions in time. Process recordings can help in developing and refining interviewing and intervention skills. By conceptualizing and organizing ongoing
activities with social work clients, you are able to clarify the purpose of interviews and interventions, identify personal and professional strengths and
weaknesses, and improve self-awareness. The process recording is also a useful tool in exploring the interpersonal dynamics and values operating between
you and the client system through an analysis of filtering the process used in recording a session.
For this Assignment, you will submit a process recording of your field education experiences specific to this week.
The Assignment (2–4 pages):
Provide a transcriipt of what happened during your field education experience, including a dialogue of interaction with a client.
Explain your interpretation of what occurred in the dialogue, including social work practice or theories, and explain how it might relate to assessment covered
this week.
Describe your reactions and/or any issues related to your interaction with a client during your field education experience.
Explain how you applied social work practice skills when performing the activities during your process recording.

Sample Solution

This week during my field education experience, I had the opportunity to interact with a client who was struggling with an addiction. We had a conversation about his current struggles and how he has been feeling since he started treatment. He expressed that he felt overwhelmed by his situation, as recovery is at times difficult and requires constant effort. During our discussion, I attempted to practice Motivational Interviewing in order to actively listen, assess the individual’s capacity for change, and explore what could be done differently in order to address his issues holistically.

I asked questions in order to better understand why this particular behavior is so difficult for him to change, emphasizing understanding through inquiry rather than judgement or criticism (Miller & Rollnick 2013). By demonstrating unconditional positive regard for my client it helped create an environment where open communication was possible (Rogers 1957). Asking open-ended questions allowed me to ascertain the level of motivation present within the individual towards making progress towards change which ultimately helps guide further steps within the assessment process (Miller & Rollnick 2013). Furthermore, I used collaborative language; rather than asking if he would comply with any proposed interventions I asked him what we could do together in order move forward and make meaningful changes where necessary.

Overall, this experience taught me how important it is to take time when conducting assessments and really get inside of a person’s head in terms of understanding their motivations both present day as well as historically speaking. The dialogue that ensued between myself and the client served not only functioned as a form of assessment but also provided insight into how social work theory can be effectively applied within real world contexts such us this one involving addiction recovery.

ng rent, whereas Americans dedicate 26 percent of their income to living expenses (Fein, 1989). The Soviets denounced the existence of poverty in their country up until Gorbachev’s leadership, and instead claimed that poverty was only brought on by capitalism. The large number of people who were experiencing economic hardships sought for change in the USSR. Despite Soviet officials claiming that the poverty was caused by laziness, many believe that poverty was brought on by the economic state of the USSR. The economy under Gorbachev suffered immensely, causing over 20 million people to live impoverished lives (Fein, 1989). The communist Soviet Union crumbled soon afterward.

A defining factor of a capitalist economy is its economic freedom. The five most economically free nations are Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Australia according to the Index of Economic Freedom (2018). Hong Kong is a part of China, yet the only things the Chinese government controls in Hong Kong is foreign relations and the military. The population grew in Hong Kong from 600, 000 to 6 million in fifty years (Friedman, 1998). This population growth was due to people fleeing from the communist state of China to Hong Kong. A major downside to reduced economic freedoms, is the reduced political freedom that typically comes with it. Both issues have gradually diminished in China since the height of their communist reign. It’s evident that people prefer freedom over control from the fact that people fled from their controlling to country, to a free country.

Friedman has said that Hong Kong has a Laissez-faire economy because government economic spending in Hong Kong is at most 15 percent of the national income (1998). Laissez-faire is French for “let it do”. In relation to economics, Laissez-faire refers to minimal interference in economics by governments. Hong Kong is very close to having a laissez-faire economy, which has its benefits. Hong Kong is very small in size, and therefore has very few natural resources; despite this, Hong Kong’s economy is booming. Its gross domestic product, GDP, per capita is the 17th highest in the world, at $61, 400 (The World Factbook, 2017). A high GDP per capita indicates a high standard of living because there is a large amount of economic output per person. The higher the GDP per capita is, the more likely it is that the public is satisfied with their country, which subsequently leads to a lower likelihood of political uprisings.

 

 

Unlike Marx’s theory that capitalism is only a stage that is overthrown by people who seek out communism after their dissatisfaction with capitalism, the Soviet Union was dissolved because people were unhappy with the communist system. The non-competitive nature of communism has negative implications on all tiers. The working class knows they are guaranteed the same benefits regardless of h

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.