Applied Sciences

 

The first step of the evidence-based practice process is to evaluate a nursing practice environment to identify a nursing problem in the clinical area. When a nursing problem is discovered, the nurse researcher develops a clinical guiding question to address that nursing practice problem.

For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem.

Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment. Prior to starting the “Literature Evaluation Table,” complete the following:
Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population.
Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. Note: This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem. A mixed methods article can qualify towards meeting a qualitative or quantitative methodology.
Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic reviews, literature reviews, and metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment.

 

 

Sample Solution

This possibility is given added credibility by results from a second line of research, that is, regression studies evaluating skills and abilities underlying reading ability (Catts, Hogan, & Fey, 2003; Curtis, 1980; Foorman, Francis, Shaywitz, Shaywitz, & Fletcher, 1997; Hoover & Gough, 1990; Vellutino, Scanlon, Small, & Tanzman, 1991; Vellutino et al., 1994). These studies have shown that there is a developmental asymmetry in the acquisition of skill in comprehending written text such that facility in word identification carries much greater weight as a determinant of reading comprehension in children at the early stages of reading development than in children at later stages, whereas language comprehension processes carry much greater weight as determinants of reading comprehension in children at later stages of reading development than in children at early stages of reading development. After further reading this article it goes on to tell the causes of cognitive deficit theories of dyslexia. Dyslexia has most often been attributed to deficiencies in visual, linguistic, and low-level sensory functions, and we exemplify such theories below. However, dyslexia has also been attributed to deficiencies in general learning abilities that are involved in all learning enterprises and not just learning to read. For example, specific reading disability has been variously attributed to deficiencies in selective attention (Douglas, 1972), associative learning (Brewer, 1967; Gascon & Goodglass, 1970), cross-modal transfer (Birch, 1962), serial-order processing (Bakker, 1972), and both pattern analysis and rule learning (Morrison & Manis, 1982). To better understand the study this is what the article stated to what happened in the study. In studies conducted comparing poor and normal readers across a broad age range (most often grades 2 through 8), few significant differences between these groups were found on measures of visual processing ability when the influence of verbal coding was controlled. For example, in experimental studies evaluating such processes (Vellutino, 1979, 1987; Vellutino & Scanlon, 1982), it was found that memory for visually presented letters and words that were visually similar (such as b, d, was, and saw) was as good in poor readers as it was in normal readers when the task required a written response rather than a naming response, which did differentiate these two groups. Language and language based deficit is a major part of learning when dealing with Dyslexia. Such findings suggest that early reading difficulties in children from this population may not be caused primarily by vocabulary and syntactic deficits and may, more often, be a consequence of prolonged reading problems. These deficits may also be co-morbid, reflecting the co-occurrence of oral language and reading difficulties (e.g., Catts et al., 2003). However, existing data do not preclude the possibility that vocabulary and syntacti

This question has been answered.

Get Answer