Sample Solution

The question of whether or not there are too many laws has been a subject of debate for centuries. On one hand, laws provide necessary safeguards and protections to citizens while on the other they can be seen as oppressive and stifling when overused or implemented without regard to their effects on individuals’ rights. A closer examination of this issue reveals that while some level of regulation is necessary in order to maintain order within society, it is important to ensure that these regulations remain reasonable and do not infringe upon people’s personal freedoms unnecessarily.

First, it must be acknowledged that having laws in place allows governments to regulate certain activities like providing public safety such as criminal statutes which protect citizens from harm; economic conditions like taxation which help redistribute wealth more equitably among members of society; and environmental protection which helps preserve natural resources for future generations(Singh 2011). These are all essential functions that would be virtually impossible if left up solely to individual discretion rather than systematic implementation through legislation.

However, there does come a point where having an excess number of rules can lead to excessive bureaucracy along with overly complicated structures which can hinder government efficiency given the amount time required process paperwork whenever new policies are put into effect (Stanoevska-Slabeva &Fenwick 2013). Similarly, too many laws can also foster corruption since those chosen act as gatekeepers may begin exploiting their authority by favoring certain groups over others in return favors; ultimately leading towards further inequality within societies where ordinary citizens no longer have ample access same opportunities available due entrenched power dynamics(Rosenbaum 2009).