Art critic

 

 

 

Imagine you are an art critic who was invited to testify in the public hearing
concerning the location of Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc in the Federal Plaza in NYC. You
are familiar with the controversy surrounding this sculpture and you need to decide
whether it is best for this work to be removed or maintained in its existing location. As
you deliberate, consider both the artistic relevance of the Tilted Arc and the complaints of
a number of office workers who frequent the plaza on a regular basis and find the work
unpleasant. Keep in mind that the work is the result of a General Service Administration
commission and that the estimated cost of its removal is $35.000. From the perspective
of an art critic, write a 3-4 sentence statement arguing in favor of preserving or removing
the Tilted Arc sculpture from the Federal Plaza. Explain the rationale for your choice
while referencing the features of the work

Sample Solution

Art critic

Tilted Arc was a controversial public art installation by Richard Serra, displayed in Foley Federal Plaza in Manhattan from 1981 to 1989. Serra saw public art as a way to expose and critique the surrounding public space, not to beautify it. This approach made Tilted Arc a target of criticism from the moment of its installation in 1981. New York Times art critic Grace Glueck called it “an awkward, bullying piece that may conceivably be the ugliest work of outdoor art in the city. Because Tilted Arc engaged with its surroundings, it could not simply be moved to another location like other sculptures. The removal of the sculpture from Federal Plaza would destroy it. it was designed specifically for the Federal Plaza space.

may themselves feel out of place according to their own ascribed traits (differences based on class, privilege, and so on.). Assessing and thinking through notions of difference and the way they affect the classroom allow both students and teachers to find the classroom as an inclusive location (Diversity in the Classroom, 2007). Critical race theory Critical race theory (CRT), is defined as the view that race, instead of being biologically grounded and natural, is socially constructed and that race, as a socially constructed concept, functions as a way to maintain the interests of the white population that assembled it (Curry, T. (2016). Based on CRT, racial inequality emerges in the societal, economic, and legal gaps in which Caucasian individuals create between “races” to keep elite Caucasian interest in labor politics and markets and as such produce the conditions that provide rise to poverty and criminality in many minority communities (Curry, T. (2016). Although the intellectual roots of this movement go back much further, the CRT movement officially organized itself in July 1989. The initiation of the CRT motion in 1989 indicated its separation from critical legal studies. Instead of drawing theories of social organization and individual behavior from continental European thinkers such as G.W.F. Hegel and Karl Marx or psychoanalytic figures like Sigmund Freud because its theoretical predecessors, as CLS and feminist jurisprudence had completed, CRT was inspired by the American civil rights heritage through figures like Martin Luther King, Jr. (Curry, T. (2016). Being steeped in a revolutionary black idea and civic thinking, critical race theory complex theoretical understandings of the law, politics, and American sociology that concentrated on the attempts of white folks (Euro-Americans) to maintain their historical benefits over individuals of color (Curry, T. (2016).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.