Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Mood Disorders

at
Categories
Tags

Photo Credit: Getty Images
Accurately diagnosing depressive disorders can be challenging given their periodic and, at times, cyclic nature. Some of these disorders occur in response to stressors and, depending on the cultural history of the client, may affect their decision to seek treatment. Bipolar disorders can also be difficult to properly diagnose. While clients with a bipolar or related disorder will likely have to contend with the disorder indefinitely, many find that the use of medication and evidence-based treatments have favorable outcomes.

TO PREPARE:
Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing and diagnosing mood disorders.
Download the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. Also review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar to see an example of a completed evaluation document.
By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.
By Day 7 of Week 3
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

Sample Solution

e plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed for the interception of the telephone lines of the plaintiff for the use of gaining information. This claim could be one of fabrication as it is not the defendant’s, but, post office whom intercepted plaintiff’s conversation. Controversial issue will be detailed at later date in judgement.

(b) Secondly, Article 8 (1) through denying plaintiff’s right of “privacy and confidentiality of telephone conversations and breach thereof disclosing interceptions and recordings”. This ultimately challenged plaintiff’s Human Right of respect for his correspondence whereby interference by the defendants (Metropolitan Police).

I. An interception of communications legislation meant prosecution’s claim that there was no statutory code governing interceptions of communications may be significant, however, authority may arise here with the introduction of Post Office Act 1969 Schedule 5.

(c) Thirdly, that of article 8 (s.2) stating that a public body shall not interfere in exercising this right under Article 8 (1) except if following the law and if required as a matter of national security within a state’s democratic society, in addition to public safety, to protect freedoms and rights of others and prevention of disorder or crime. Therefore, in relation to Human Rights, telephone disclosure and interceptions could be in breach thereof.

(d) Subsequently similar to Article 8 is Article 13, suggesting that if any person’s rights or freedoms are violated as set forth within this Convention shall have before a national authority an effective remedy notwithstanding that the violation of the Convention has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity. Was the injunction and warrant received by plaintiff a violation of Convention rights?
Per curiam: with such declarations being of a complex nature, in the definitive sense that, no effective legislation nor remedy is provided to plaintiff. I suggest that this be a matter for Parliament, our elected and unelected judiciary, to discuss further. This is so to prevent further misfortunes within the Court of law. In addition, to enforce within, court judicial action is requiring for this specific legal matter which may lead to creation of effective legislation. This may lead to ambiguity and lack of clarity to address the main English authorities in relation to the European Convention rights for my judgement.

Complying with statement mentioned is the Vice Chancellor whom suggested that any regul

This question has been answered.

Get Answer