Accurately diagnosing depressive disorders can be challenging given their periodic and, at times, cyclic nature. Some of these disorders occur in response to stressors and, depending on the cultural history of the client, may affect their decision to seek treatment. Bipolar disorders can also be difficult to properly diagnose. While clients with a bipolar or related disorder will likely have to contend with the disorder indefinitely, many find that the use of medication and evidence-based treatments have favorable outcomes.
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Subjective:
The patient, a 32-year-old female with no prior psychiatric history, presented with a chief complaint of feeling “down” and unmotivated for the past two months. She reported difficulty concentrating at work, leading to increased errors and potential disciplinary action. Sleep has been disrupted, with early morning awakenings and difficulty falling asleep. She described a lack of interest in activities she used to enjoy, like socializing with friends or going to the gym. Her appetite has decreased, and she has lost 10 pounds in the past two months. The patient denied any suicidal ideation or thoughts of harming herself or others.
Objective:
During the interview, the patient appeared sad and tearful. Her speech was slow and monotone, with psychomotor retardation evident. Eye contact was minimal. She denied any hallucinations or delusions.
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination:
Differential Diagnoses:
Critical Thinking Process:
The patient’s symptoms align more closely with MDD criteria than the other diagnoses. The duration and severity of her symptoms significantly impact her daily life. The absence of a clear stressor and the lack of manic or hypomanic episodes rule out Adjustment Disorder and Bipolar Disorder, respectively.
Pertinent Positives for MDD:
Pertinent Negatives for Bipolar Disorder:
Primary Diagnosis:
Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Moderate Severity (DSM-5-TR code: 296.21 [F32.1])
Reflection Notes:
If I could conduct the session again, I would delve deeper into the patient’s social history and explore potential social stressors that might have contributed to the development of the MDD. Additionally, a more detailed family history regarding mood disorders would be beneficial.
Legal/Ethical Considerations:
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention:
Risk Factors:
Socioeconomic and Cultural Considerations: