Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patients mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over?Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Due to limitations as a large language model, this evaluation cannot provide a specific diagnosis. However, the following template demonstrates a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation process for K.Y.:
Subjective:
Unfortunately, without a direct interview with K.Y., details about her chief complaint and symptomology are unavailable. However, given the nature of her work and the age group she sees (middle-aged adults), we can speculate on potential concerns she might raise:
Objective:
Since a direct assessment cannot be conducted, objective observations are unavailable. However, some potential observations during a future evaluation might include:
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination (MSE) Results (Hypothetical):
Differential Diagnoses:
Rationale for Differential Diagnoses:
Critical Thinking Process:
The critical thinking process would involve:
Based on this evaluation, Adjustment Disorder would be the most likely diagnosis if K.Y.’s symptoms are recent and primarily work-related. However, a more in-depth assessment is needed for a definitive diagnosis.
Pertinent Positives:
Pertinent Negatives:
Reflection Notes:
If possible, conducting the session in a relaxed and private setting would be ideal.
Legal/Ethical Considerations: