The Alzheimer’s Association defines dementia as a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life (Alzheimer’s Association, 2016). This term encompasses dozens of cognitive disorders of impaired memory formation, recall, and communication. The care and treatment of clients with dementia is dependent on multiple factors, including the stage of dementia, comorbidities, family support, and even the care setting. In your role, as the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, you must be prepared to not only treat clients with these various cognitive disorders, but also the multiple behavioral issues that often accompany them. For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat clients presenting with dementia.
The Assignment
Examine Case Study: An Elderly Iranian Man With Alzheimer’s Disease. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point stop to complete the following:
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Socratic Communism
Since the beginning there were numerous thoughts and plans in the network structure. Majority rule government and tyranny are two instances of network structure plan. Numerous effective political structures and other political structures flop because of absence of help or political structure. There are network structures which exist just in principle. The hypothetical network structure is Socrates’ reasonable society.
It is thinking, relational abilities and state funded training. His perspectives and thoughts are reflected in crafted by his partners. In Plato’s work, Socrates’ dad is Sophroniscus and his mom is a birthing specialist Phaenarete. Socrates weds an a lot more youthful xanthipe than he, and he has three children, Lamprocles, Sophroniscus and Menexenus. Little is thought about the way of life of Socrates. As indicated by Timon, he took over stone work exchange, privately-owned company, however the Xenophon variant demonstrated that he dedicated his life to philosophical discussion. In Aristophanes’ work, Socrates oversees modern schools and shows that they are getting checks. Xenophon and Plato didn’t concur with this announcement, Socrates didn’t acknowledge any installment for his instructing, and his neediness was proof of this reality. In Plato’s discussion, he delineated Socrates as a fighter, worked for the Athenian armed force, and took an interest in the skirmish of Potida, Amphipolis, and Delium.
Plato expounded on 30 discussions, the majority of whom were the heroes of Socrates. Carefully, this term communicates Socrates’ work as a letter. In any case, as a kind containing different writings, Plato’s Law and Xenophon’s Hero are discoursed of Socrates that admirably discusses other than Socrates (Athens Stranger and Simoni separately). In Plato and Xenophon’s work, the heroes of every exchange are normally Socrates and attempting to see progressively about understanding others’ ethical issues through cross examination implies. In the discussion, Socrates expressed that he was a basic individual, and he recognized that he knew nearly nothing. Through this unexpected methodology, he had the option to befuddle another who professed to be a specialist in the field he was talking about. Because of the exchange, Socrates demonstrated that the perspective of the adversary is opposing. Along these lines, Socrates endeavors to show the best approach to genuine shrewdness.