Assessing Environmental Science

at
Categories
Tags

 

1. Consider the source of drinking water for your community. What is the source of the drinking water? What pollutants are potential or actual impacts on that water source? Evaluating the existing controls for these pollutants, what additional controls would you suggest to improve the environmental quality of that water source? Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
2. Describe the integrated waste management approach and how the four Rs of waste reduction help to provide an alternative to a throwaway economy.
Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
3. Describe three sources of indoor air pollution and three sources of outdoor air pollution, as well as one prescribed method of controlling pollution for each of the six sources.
Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
4. Describe three sources of point source water pollution and three sources of nonpoint source water pollution for surface water, groundwater, or oceans, as well as one prescribed method of controlling pollution for each of the six sources.
Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
5. Consider the three basic but different environmental worldviews presented in this unit. Our environmental worldviews can change over time and with different learning experiences. Describe your own current environmental worldview. Which basic environmental worldview seems to be most closely related to your own current environment worldview, and why?
Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
6. Describe two of the eight environmental policy principles designed to reduce environmental harm and encourage government legislatures’ environmental conservation laws and policies.
Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
7. Describe six of the “Sustainability Dozen” guidelines for living more sustainably. Provide at least one example of each guideline.
Must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
8. Describe the five ways that low-throughput economies work to produce environmentally sustainable human societies.

Sample Solution

Assessment of the fine of research is a crucial issue of proof syntheses along with systematic reviews (SRs) which are used to tell coverage decisions. To lessen the capacity for reviewer bias, and to make sure that the findings of SRs are obvious and reproducible, enterprises along with the Cochrane Collaboration, the Campbell Collaboration, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, propose the usage of formal fine evaluation equipment rather than casual professional judgment. However, there’s a bewildering array of around three hundred formal fine evaluation equipment which have been recognized withinside the literature, and it’s been tested that the use of various equipment for the evaluation of the equal research can bring about specific estimates of fine, that can doubtlessly opposite the conclusions of an SR.

It seems to be the case that capital punishment can be justified on moral grounds as it does more good than harm. In John Stuart Mill’s “Speech in Favor of Capital Punishment,” he argues that capital punishment is the most appropriate “mode in which society can attach to so great a crime the penal consequences which for the security of life it is indispensable to annex to it.” He argues this for many reasons. His first point is that capital punishment is more humane to the criminal than the prison system. At first glance, it appears that the death penalty is cruel and unusual because we, as humans, are scared to inflict death on another human, no matter what crime has been committed. However, Mill argues that while the “short pang of a rapid death” seems merciless, caging a criminal “in a living tomb” for a “long life in the hardest and most monotonous toil…debarred from all pleasant sights and sounds, and cut off from all earthly hope” is far crueler than it seems (Mill). This is seen in examples from Aaron Rodriguez to Mark Salling to Adolf Hitler. All of these people would rather commit suicide and die than be sentenced to life in prison. Thus, it can be argued that prison is “less severe indeed in appearance…but far more cruel in reality” (Mill).

Because of capital punishment’s appearance of severity, it serves as an effective deterrent for crime. Someone who is thinking of committing a horrible crime might not do so if he knows there is a possibility of death if he is caught. Some would argue that capital punishment does not deter crime, but Mill responds to this by asking, “Who is there who knows whom it has deterred?” to make the point that we cannot be certain how many people were or were not deterred from committing a crime because of the threat of the death penalty. Furthermore, he points out that the “influence of a punishment is not to be estimated by its effect on hardened criminals,” but rather the “impression it makes on those who are still innocent” (Mill). While it may seem that crime is not being deterred, the threat of capital punishment does influence people to not commit crimes. Imagine if there was no alarming threat of punishment for murder; certainly, there would be more murders. Capital punishment deters crime, which thus prevents unhappiness.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer