Bacillus anthracis

 

Introduction:
All good papers begin with an introductory paragraph. You will introduce your organism by
name and basic information.
Descriiption of the Microorganism :
Write a paragraph or so describing your organism. Please be sure to include the type of
organism (bacterial, viral, fungal, protozoa, helminth, etc), morphology (shape, arrangement,
colony morphology if applicable), descriiption of structure (gram result, type of nucleic acid or
virion structure, spore type, etc if applicable) and also the type of microscope and/or stain you
would use to view the organism. Please use proper scientific terminology and good grammar and
sentence structure throughout this project.
Virulence Factors:
Include a paragraph on the virulence factors the pathogen has and how they affect the host.
Please enhance this with detailed explanations of the virulence factors and how they affect the
host as you gain a better understanding of them throughout the semester.
Immunity:
Which defenses protect us from infection by this bacterium? Include information about specific
barriers or cells. Does this pathogen induce a specific type of immune response (example:
delayed-type hypersensitivity)? If so, which one(s)?
Infectious disease information:
What condition(s) or infectious diseases does it cause? Which tissues or organs are affected, and
how are they affected (for example, chronic TB is characterized by lung tubercles)? Describe the
complications that can result if the infection is left untreated. Are these acute, chronic, or latent
infections? What organ system(s) does it infect? Is it an opportunistic pathogen? If so, where is
it normally found in the body?
Epidemiology:
Be sure that in-text citations
follow APA guidelines.
Draw and label an original diagram on how this organism is transmitted. Make sure you include
the reservoirs of infection, and vectors in involved in transmission, the type of transmission and
the portals of entry and exit.
Prevention:
Is there a childhood vaccine against this microbe? Name the vaccine. If so, when is it
administered (the recommended schedule, including boosters)? If the vaccine is not
recommended during childhood, which at-risk group should get the vaccine, and when? Describe
the type of vaccine and how it works. If there is no vaccine available, list at least three measures
that can be implemented to prevent transmission of this infection.
Treatment:
What Chemotherapeutic agents are recommended? Mechanism of action for these
chemotherapeutic agents. Why this agent is efficacious against this organism? Additional
therapeutic agents or practices if any. This could include supportive care.
Clinical Relevance:
Are there any Multi-Drug Resistant strains of this microorganism? If so, name the strain(s). Is
this strain a known healthcare-associated pathogen? Which persons/procedures within a clinical
or healthcare-assisted settings are particularly at risk? Which antibiotics are used against the
MDR strains? Be specific.
Conclusion:
Wrap everything up. A good academic research paper should bring everything full circle with a
solid conclusion.

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.