Bad Hypotheses

Briefly describe a simple experiment in one or two sentences and make a bad
hypothesis based on the common mistakes listed in the PreLab. Reply to each other’s
posts citing the kind of error made and what a better hypothesis would be.
3. Home Experiment
You make all kinds of comparisons at home. Choosing the best laundry detergent,
deciding which route to work is the fastest, etc. Pick one of these and propose an
experiment, complete with all three types of variables named. Critique each other’s
experiments and suggest improvements. Consider how the dependent variable will be
measured, which control variables are most important, and whether a control
experiment is needed.

Sample Solution

things to not be so accurate in the film. The speech and most of the photos would not have happened in the work of the fiction, due to the war’s ending. However, there were a few photos that support it through the earlier time period showing the way Hitler lived his life in Europe at the time of the invasion. Over the entirety of the film there are not many chances to see the front lines, but there are scenes that show the higher ranks of Nazi soldier’s parting or at films. In the photos represented in Germany at War in Color, the parties or gatherings were in a bigger area and had way more guards and security personal on watch, which the movie did not have. The entirety of the film was not similar to what the setting would have truly been.

Over the course of viewing the film I believe that the makers made the film with comedy and a big “what if” of what the war could have been like. The way that the movie was filmed with chapters, as if it were a book, was a twist on trying to make it more of a story or book that went off of different point of views, as the movie did. The way the characters were portrayed or acted was very stereotypical which added a comical side to the story. Whether it was the southern American Lieutenant Aldo Raine who was very stubborn, or Hitler who sported a cape and mustache and had an anger issue, it added to the comedy of the film. The addition of the different point of views was a good way of learning how each of the characters was developed and what they believed in or were after. The major reason I believe they made the movie for is the “what if” factor. The movie gives a great idea of what the war could have been like with the death of the leader of the Axis Powers, or how it would have been different if Americans were able to get an insurgent team in. The idea of a different outcome because of a different approach could actually help teach history by showing the different causes and effects that could happen from choices. It can show how ridiculously comical and easy the war could have been avoided. It also helped give a sort of an idea of how the life of a runaway “Jew” was like, or German leaders, and what spies would have experienced during WWII. This movie could be used in a history class as many things. It could be used as a sort of propaganda for what WWII could have been like. It could be used to show what certain people’s situations and lives were like in that time in Europe, under Nazi order. Lastly, it could be used as a comparison between facts and fictional beliefs.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.