Yes, it is possible to enhance the bargaining range of options to advance human rights in Kampuchea. There are a number of ways to do this, including:

• Strengthening civil society: A strong civil society is essential for holding governments accountable and advocating for human rights. This can be done by supporting local NGOs, providing them with training and resources, and helping them to build networks and coalitions.
• Promoting international pressure: International pressure can be an effective way to influence the behavior of authoritarian governments. This can be done through diplomatic pressure, sanctions, and public shaming.
• Empowering ordinary people: Ordinary people have a lot of power to create change. This can be done by educating them about their rights, helping them to organize and mobilize, and providing them with the skills and resources they need to advocate for themselves.

It is important to note that enhancing the bargaining range of options to advance human rights in Kampuchea will be a challenging task. The Cambodian government has a history of human rights abuses and is not known for being responsive to domestic and international pressure. However, by strengthening civil society, promoting international pressure, and empowering ordinary people, it is possible to create a more favorable environment for human rights progress in Kampuchea.

Here are some specific examples of how the bargaining range of options to advance human rights in Kampuchea can be enhanced:

• Support for local NGOs: International donors and organizations can support local NGOs in Kampuchea by providing them with funding, training, and technical assistance. This can help them to strengthen their capacity to monitor and report on human rights abuses, advocate for policy reform, and provide services to victims of human rights abuses.
• International pressure: The international community can put pressure on the Cambodian government to improve its human rights record through a variety of means, including diplomatic pressure, sanctions, and public shaming. For example, the United States has imposed sanctions on Cambodian officials involved in human rights abuses. The European Union has also withdrawn some of its development aid to Cambodia in response to the government’s crackdown on civil society and the media.
• Empowering ordinary people: International donors and organizations can empower ordinary people in Kampuchea to advocate for their rights by educating them about their rights, helping them to organize and mobilize, and providing them with the skills and resources they need to make their voices heard. For example, some international organizations have been working to train Cambodian citizens on how to use social media to advocate for human rights.

RQ2: What is the bargaining range of human rights possibilities for authoritarian regimes?

The bargaining range of human rights possibilities for authoritarian regimes is typically quite narrow. Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by a lack of political pluralism, the suppression of dissent, and the rule of law. These conditions make it difficult for civil society to organize and advocate for human rights. Additionally, authoritarian regimes are often willing to use repression to maintain their power, which can make it costly and dangerous for people to speak out in favor of human rights.

However, there are some examples of authoritarian regimes that have made progress on human rights. In some cases, this has been due to pressure from the international community or from within the regime itself. For example, the Chinese government has made some progress on human rights in recent years, although it is still a repressive regime. This progress has been attributed in part to the fact that China is increasingly integrated into the global economy and is therefore more susceptible to international pressure.

In other cases, authoritarian regimes have made progress on human rights in order to improve their image or to attract foreign investment. For example, the government of Vietnam has made some progress on human rights in order to improve its relationship with the United States.

Overall, the bargaining range of human rights possibilities for authoritarian regimes is typically quite narrow. However, there are some examples of authoritarian regimes that have made progress on human rights, due to pressure from the international community or from within the regime itself.

Conclusion

It is possible to enhance the bargaining range of options to advance human rights in Kampuchea. This can be done by strengthening civil society, promoting international pressure, and empowering ordinary people. However, it is important to note that this will be a challenging task, as the Cambodian government has a history of human rights abuses and is not known for being responsive to domestic and international pressure.

The bargaining range of human rights possibilities for authoritarian regimes is typically quite narrow. However, there are some examples of authoritarian regimes that have made progress on human rights, due to pressure from the international community or from within the regime itself.