1. Find at least one Bayer product in each of the breakthrough, platform, and derivative categories (minimum a total of 3 products). You must place the products on the graph (attached PowerPoint) to receive credit for this assignment, and explain your choices and references. A breakthrough product must be within the past 5 years to qualify. Platform products enable the development of derivatives.
2. How do you think the acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer changed the resource allocation strategy?
The acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer in 2018 had a major impact on the resource allocation strategy for both companies. As part of the agreement, Bayer acquired all of Monsanto’s assets and liabilities, including its technology portfolio and research and development capabilities (Jacobson et al., 2019).
One major change to Bayer’s resource allocation strategy as a result of this merger was the increased focus on product development in the agricultural industry. By acquiring Monsanto, Bayer gained access to their extensive library of patents which covered genetically modified crops, herbicides and other agrochemicals that are widely used in modern farming (Gillespie & Ivey Smith , 2019 ). This allowed them to expand their product portfolio with new innovations that could give them a competitive edge over rivals such as Syngenta or DuPont (Gillespie & Ivey Smith , 2019).
Another impact from this merger was an increase in Bayer’s market share within the agriculture sector. With Monsanto now under their banner they have become one of the largest players in this arena with about 25% market share world-wide( Jacobson et al., 2019). This has enabled them to leverage economies of scale by consolidating production facilities and streamlining operations thereby allowing them to better compete against larger competitors like BASF.
Furthermore ,combining two powerful brands like bayer & monsanto will allow bayers gain advantages associated with brand recognition .Combining marketing strategies along would help bayer gain more audience attention while expanding their customer base .They also can maximize profits through cross selling products from each other resulting higher profits compared to when operating independently.(Chapman& Healy 2020)
In conclusion,the acquisition between bayer & monsanto has changed bayers resource allocation strategy significantly .By leveraging economies scale ,accessing patent portfolio along with brand recognition benefits company can now stay competitive against rival firms operating within same industry.
Quality altering as of now has broad applications, for instance, in farming, and it has energized sees, with entire enemy of GMO developments occurring all over the planet. Vandana Siva, a social lobbyist from India vigorously advances naturally developed food and is emphatically against hereditarily changed crops in ranches (Navdanya, n.d). She accepts that ‘the general concept of GMOs is a mark of the end for biodiversity.’ She contends that the ‘respectability of life’ will never again exist when partnerships push out and promote the hereditarily changed crops which they produce (Greens-EFA, 2013). This paper centers around the utilization of quality altering in people, yet a reference to agribusinesses with regards to hereditarily changed food gives a valuable road to understanding how companies and enormous business mean to and are as of now involving quality altering for benefit.
Maybe the most well-known utilization of quality altering beyond clinical exploration in people, is in ‘architect children. ‘Since quality altering allows you to alter the hereditary code and change the attributes of anything, you can really make ‘originator children’, by changing the hereditary code of your prospective conceived undeveloped organism, giving it any trademark you need (Pang and Ho, 2016). In the cutting edge world, the corrective business covers more than 500 billion USD (Cosmetic market esteem around the world, 2018-2025 | Statista, 2018), which shows the sheer significance society puts on appearance. Victor Hugg, a social researcher composing for Iowa State Daily, says that “The quantity of individuals in our general public who put an excessive measure of significant worth on the actual appearance of themselves — and of others — is overpowering” and “each person makes decisions in light of somebody’s age, level, weight, hair, eye tone, etc” (Hugg, 2011) . Since society is so centered around appearance, essayists like Hugg contend that individuals believe appearance to be what directs their worth. This could prompt an ever increasing number of individuals utilizing quality altering to modify their kids’ appearances.
Magnificence principles have a gigantic impact in the cutting edge world. One might say that quality altering, and all the more explicitly, architect children, would empower social norms in regards to excellence to proceed and deteriorate. Ladies are feeling the squeeze to look a specific method for fitting in and adjust to the body standard at that point (Mazur, 2010). One year, blue eyes might be the norm, then it might change to brown in a couple of years. This is a comparative case with body shape. As per an examination directed in 2007, 90% of all