“Becoming Chinese American”

at
Categories
Tags

 

watch the documentary and answer the following questions. Each question is worth two points each. You must answer in paragraph form and respond to two students (2.5pts each).

Please watch video on “Becoming Chinese American” from 1:00 – 2:00

https://youtu.be/sosstso0FQg?t=3600 (Links to an external site.)

What was the law that excluded the Chinese Americans from immigrating? Explain how that law affected the Chinese.
How did the immigration laws affect the Chinese women?
How were Chinese women oppressed by Chinese men?
What was the experience for the Chinese women in Chinatown?
Where did the women of Chinatown seek refuge at?
Who was Donaldina Cameron? How did she help the women of Chinatown?
Who was Anna May Wong? What type of discrimination did she face in her profession?
What did you learn about the experiences of the Chinese women from the documentary

Sample Solution

Shehong Chen analyzes how Chinese immigrants to the United States changed themselves into Chinese Americans between 1911 and 1927 in this ground-breaking work. Debates over reform and revolution politicized and divided Chinese communities in the United States as the drive for a modern China culminated in the 1911 revolution in China. In the early 1910s, Chinese in the United States upheld traditional Chinese values and voiced their own unique views of a modern China, while nationalist impulses spurred them to fight for their right to be recognized as a contributing member of American society. In 1915, the fledgling Chinese nation was confronted with its first severe danger from Japan.

association, because of the huge number of requirements on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), recommends that the viability of a gathering is subject to the administration styles of the pioneer and their favourability to the circumstance. A large part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored colleague scale (LPC). The LPC expects to measure a potential chiefs way to deal with an errand on a size of relationship roused to task spurred, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is happening to be reasoned, and in this manner permits the distinguishing proof of appropriate pioneers for undertakings. The favourableness of the circumstance relies upon three qualities: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the lucidity of the errand to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). In the event that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler’s possibility model offers an exceptionally grave categorisation of administration, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won’t bring about progress for a likely pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal construction inside an association the hypothesis can be applied openly, right off the bat because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted on the off chance that their LPC score doesn’t match that expected of the circumstance (Pettinger, 2007). Furthermore, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. Notwithstanding, further down the order Fielder’s possibility hypothesis starts to hold substantially less significance, it becomes unfeasible according to a hierarchical viewpoint because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of initiative. The strategies of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored collaborator is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer