Beginning in the early 20th century, archaeological expeditions related to the Bistec culture of SouthBasan

 

Beginning in the early 20th century, archaeological expeditions related to the Bistec culture of SouthBasan led to the unexpected discovery of monumental architecture (e.g., temples and storage silos) andsmaller artifacts (e.g., turquoise jewelry and copper vessels). Although several university and museuminstitutions from around the world were involved with the Bistec archaeological investigations, Dr. FernandoGuzmn, archaeologist and head curator of the Afar University Museum in South Basan, became theforemost scholar in the region. Over the course of working in South Basan over two decades, Fernandoamassed a sizable collection of artifacts which were ultimately housed at the Afar University Museum in theneighboring country of Ustana.Around the time of his retirement, Fernando sought to ensure the preservation of the Bistec artifacts.He placed the entire collection under the auspices of Dr. Ignacio Vallera, his former mentee and head curatorof archaeology at the Stepworth University Museum in the country of New Whayles, Although the Bisteccollection was legally under the care of the Afar University Museum, Fernando, with permission from theSouth Basan Antiquities Department (according to collections records) transferred the Bistec collection to theStepworth University Museum. He did so without the knowledge of the Afar University administration,fearing that they might consider repatriating the collection to South Basan due to growing protests fromIndigenous Bistec communities over the loss of their cultural heritage. In a letter addressed to the StepworthUniversity Museum, Fernando stated that the Bistec collection was to be held indefinitely at Stepworth andwould fall directly under the care of Ignacio at the Stepworth University Museum.Over 10 years after the arrival of the Bistec collection at Stepworth University, Dr. Sergio Rodriguez,a newly hired assistant curator of archaeology at Stepworth, discovers paperwork related to the Bisteccollection. The paperwork found by Sergio includes (1) the original letter written by Fernando addressed tothe Stepworth University Museum and (2) a list of illicitly purchased antiquities with problematicprovenience. Some of these artifacts were housed within the Bistec collection and were likely obtainedthrough looting and trafficking in violation of South Basanian and international laws and treaties. Troubled byhis new findings, Sergio approaches Ignacio and asks for an explanation.”Are you serious, Sergio?” Ignacio mutters angrily under his breath. “Do you know how much of themuseum exhibition space and storage facilities are made up of items from the Bistec collection? Do you?You’re looking to open up Pandora’s Box here. You never saw anything. Leave this matter alone if you knowwhat’s good for you.”Uncertain how to proceed, Sergio wants to address the nebulous status of the Bistec collection atStepworth as well as the illicitly purchased antiquities within the collection. He is especially worried about apotential looming crisis in the face of mounting concern expressed by both the Indigenous peoples of Basanand the Afar University Museum. At the same time, he has a family to feed and can’t afford to lose the job hehas worked so hard for and his standing in the museum community.

Prompt 1 Questions

1. After Dr. Fernando Guzmn gifted his collection to Dr. Ignacio Vallera, what should Dr. Vallera havedone?

2. What elements of UNESCO 1970 are most important when considering this scenario? How do they helpto inform a possible course of action?

3. How should Sergio navigate the fact that many of the Bistec objects are stolen, looted, or illegallypurchased?

4. How might Sergio balance the needs of the Afar Museum and Indigenous people with the protectiveattitude of Ignacio?

 

Sample Solution

Analyzing the Bistec Collection Dilemma

Question 1: What should Dr. Ignacio Vallera have done?

Dr. Vallera should have ensured the ethical acquisition of the Bistec collection. He should have verified the legality of the transfer and the provenance of each artifact. Additionally, he should have established clear protocols for the care, study, and potential repatriation of the collection. By failing to do so, he has contributed to the ethical and legal complexities of the situation.

Question 2: UNESCO 1970 and Its Relevance

The UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural 1 Property (1970) is a crucial international 2 treaty that addresses the illicit trafficking of cultural property. Several elements of this convention are relevant to the Bistec collection scenario:  

  • International Cooperation: The convention encourages international cooperation to prevent illicit trafficking and facilitate the return of stolen cultural property.
  • Due Diligence: Museums and collectors have a responsibility to conduct due diligence to ensure that objects are acquired legally.
  • Repatriation: The convention outlines procedures for the return of cultural property to its country of origin.

Question 3: Navigating the Illicit Artifacts

Sergio faces a complex ethical dilemma. He should consider the following steps:

  • Document the Evidence: Carefully document all evidence related to the illicitly acquired artifacts, including photographs, correspondence, and purchase records.
  • Consult with Legal Experts: Seek legal advice to understand the legal implications of possessing and potentially returning the stolen artifacts.
  • Inform the Museum Director: Disclose his findings to the museum director, emphasizing the ethical and legal implications.
  • Contact the Afar University Museum: Reach out to the Afar University Museum to discuss the situation and explore potential options for repatriation.
  • Collaborate with Law Enforcement: If necessary, involve law enforcement authorities to investigate the illegal acquisition of the artifacts.

Question 4: Balancing Interests

Sergio must carefully balance the interests of the Afar University Museum, the Indigenous Bistec people, and the Stepworth University Museum. He can approach this by:

  • Prioritizing Ethical Conduct: Adhering to ethical principles and international standards for cultural heritage.
  • Open and Honest Communication: Engaging in open and honest dialogue with all parties involved.
  • Seeking Legal Counsel: Consulting with legal experts to understand the legal implications of different courses of action.
  • Advocating for Repatriation: Supporting the return of the illicitly acquired artifacts to their rightful owners.
  • Balancing Institutional Interests: Considering the interests of the Stepworth University Museum while upholding ethical principles.

By taking a proactive and ethical approach, Sergio can navigate this complex situation and contribute to the protection of cultural heritage.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.