Berger’s theory of externalization

In your own words** what does Berger’s theory of externalization, objectification, and internalization mean? Can you summarize this in 1-2 sentences to show that you understand the basic point?

2-What was your favorite example from the Garfinkel reading?

3-Describe an experience you’ve had where you have to manage your “front stage” and “back stage” as Goffman described? Was it tiring, as Hochschild describes?

4-Which of the ideas from the critical theories resonated with you the most and why?

5-Thinking about all of the theories that we explored in the 2nd half of the semester for contemporary theory, which include:

1) functionalism, 2) conflict, 3) exchange theory and rational choice, 4) globalization, 5) symbolic interactionism, 6) critical theories

 

Which theory(theories) resonated with you the most and why?

6-Thinking about everything that we have covered in the semester since the first day of class… Do you think sociological theory will inform your perspective after this class? Why or why not? And how?

7- One great thing about Symbolic Interactionism is the way it sheds light on our every day interactions and illuminates the social performances that we cultivate (often unconsciously!).

What “scripts” or schemas do you find yourself performing in your daily life? In other words, what did this branch of theory illuminate about YOUR daily “staged” behavior?

We all do it! Share examples that you feel comfortable sharing with the group here.

8- In your minds–what are some of the most pressing topics/concepts/ideas/perspectives that Sociology should “deconstruct” in the future?

Sample Solution

Disruptors
There are a number of disruptors that will strongly influence education and education technology over the next few years.
Neuroscience
Modern neuroscience is still very young but is having a significant impact on educational thinking, mainly because of the wow factor. While it is giving us new insights into the learning process, we have to be careful simply because many of its findings are still conjectural. It is also a two-edged sword as people with anti-technology agendas are using it to promote their arguments. Over the coming three to five years we will see new discoveries, the refining and/or rejection of theories, and the need to make sure that education technology engages with the field in a mutually beneficial way.
The key findings that are significant from a technology point of view are as follows:
1. The optimum experiences through which the brain learns are more in tune with gaming than formal education. Repeated trial and error with constant failure, short tasks and rewards, multi-sensory input with an emphasis on visual 3d and a sense of ‘false danger’ all massively boost cognition and create a sense of immersion.
2. Emotional security has a massive physical impact on cognition. Safe, positive and emotionally secure situations are necessary for learning. This underscores the need to tackle cyberbullying.
3. Certain activities are better suited to non-technological solutions. A good example is texts. Neuroscience indicates that reading a physical book boosts cognition and enhances a wide range of skills to a greater extent than reading text on a virtual screen. We are already seeing a move back towards books in the classroom, especially in literacy classes.
4. The impact of screen use on developing minds continues to be contro

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.