Big Data


What are the the three characteristics of Big Data, and what are the main considerations in processing Big Data?

Sample Answer

Big data can be defined as representing assets of information with quality of high volume, velocity and variety to require specific technology and analytical methods as a way of transformation into value. It can alternatively be summarized as a massive volume of both structured and unstructured data that is so large that it becomes difficult to process using the traditional database and software techniques. the characteristic nature of big data as seen in the definition include volume and velocity.


SOCIAL THEORIES FOR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

A REFLECTIVE REPORT ON GROUP POSTER

The principle reason for the report is to show an understanding social work hypothesis for training individual focused methodology in connection to grown-ups with gloom; the intended interest group is social work understudies. As indicated by Teater (2010:1) hypothesis "predicts, clarify and survey circumstances and practices, and give a method of reasoning to how the social laborer ought to respond and mediate." Therefore social work hypothesis for training is characterized "as a lot of thoughts used to guide practice and which are adequately rational that they could if essential, be made express in structure which is open them to challenge." Payne (1997:150) held the view that for a social work hypothesis to be fruitful in accomplishing its outcome it required three components, point of view, a clarifying hypothesis and a model. Teater (2010:4) stressed that social specialists may join learning hypothesis with social learning hypothesis to work with an administration client, as hypothesis advises practice. Payne (2002:270) expressed that "a hypothesis can't be assessed uniquely in connection to its thoughts and adequacy, in light of the fact that the thoughts have a verifiable and social setting and viability is made a decision as indicated by specific institutional prerequisites."

At the point when my gathering met each gathering part gave recommendations of what hypothesis they thought would be a smart thought we chosen to make a publication on Person-focused methodology. The title of the publication was "An individual focused methodology in connection to grown-ups with sorrow: a guide for social work understudies. The motivation behind building up this publication was to advise and instruct social work understudies about Person-focused methodology in a connection to grown-ups managing discouragement. To have a comprehension of my job and commitment to the gathering it is fundamental to survey the procedure of how the group shaped. The gathering shaped not because of decision but rather because of irregular determination however with thought of where we lived as this would make it simpler to meet up. The development of the gathering caused me to understand that I didn't have a decision in choosing who I would work with however in spite of that I was content with my gathering and we functioned admirably to finish the job needing to be done. The gathering was little and comprised of 4 individuals 3 females and 1 male and with various experience and instructive foundation. A gathering can be characterized from numerous points of view which identify with capacity, participation for example why individuals join and whether enrollment is deliberate and its objectives and inevitable reason. Cartwright and Zander (1968) portrays the gathering "as a total of people remaining in relations to one another, the relations exemplified will rely upon or decide the sort of gathering, regardless of whether it is a family, a group of people, a council, association, or group".

Hogg et al (2005) characterized a group as "a gathering of individuals sorted out to work reliantly or agreeably to finish a particular or achieve a reason or objective". On reflection it is fundamental to take note of that my gathering was an undertaking focused one since it was simply set up so as to finish the main job. Essentially the gathering had community this identifies with "a world view dependent on the possibility that the gathering needs and objectives could easily compare to any person". We attempted to finish the undertaking and experienced Bruce Tuckman gatherings create through five fundamental stages: Forming – trepidation, Storming – strife, Norming – status and job fulfillment, performing – objective endeavoring and achievement, Adjourning – disbanding or re-sorting out (Thompson 2010: 92).

Nobody had been designated as pioneer however there were two distinct pioneers who assumed the job of choosing what assignment every one of us ought to do. This happened because of the two inclination that they were going to take on additional, we let them lead the pack because of their readiness to embrace most of the errand. Regardless of this I figured out how to assume responsibility when it went to the title and how data was shown. Because of the absence of clear initiative this implied we didn't constantly get together and there was no opportunity to practice before exhibiting to the class. Each colleague was given an assignment to finish however because of absence of clear jobs and duties and we jumped on to finish the main job. As indicated by Thompson (2009:160) "great practice depends on association, cooperation and great correspondence among all individuals". It was fundamental to make positive gathering elements as this would help the connection between the colleagues, all things considered the relationship must be useful just as profitable (Lafasto and Larson 2001).

Belbin (1996:64) expressed "that a way to deal with human connections in work gatherings, wherein every individual has a characterized job". For this situation there were two individuals that were the pioneers and they were overwhelming in settling on choices without counseling the remainder of the group. In connection to group jobs I assumed the job of asset examiner Belbin (1981: 84) portrays this as an individual that is extremely hopeful. I attempted to transfer my assessment so as to contribute and make remedies true to form by the gathering however to my work was ignored in my nonappearance. There are various issues that can influence a decent gathering dynamic and for our group it was poor correspondence, diverse data would be passed on yet subsequent to meeting different groups had accomplished something in an unexpected way. This factor I accept influenced my exhibition and others too. For example we messaged each other what our thoughts yet the two chiefs were negative towards my recommendations and the reacted such that exhibited choices had been made as of now.

Besides not all individuals got refreshes due to not being connected in so there was missed data, at the season of showing proposals on how it ought to be done were disregarded this was irritating and evoked some forceful feelings. Lamentably it was late to determine this issue I felt unequivocally that choices were made without basic examination and this was an immediate consequence of absence of initiative.

When we began to build up the notice we perceived that we had restricted time, space and along these lines we chose to build up a blurb that was exact, compact and simple for the social work understudies and administration clients to get it. The reason for existing was to educate and give a comprehension of about the social hypothesis for training and furthermore how well it functions with administration clients. It was additionally fundamental for the plan and shading plan of the notice to be handy. Concurring Fook et al (2007:54) states that "contingent upon visual workshops understudies or individuals are bound to recall bright introductions and are attracted to them".

The publication was great it depicted the social work hypothesis for training and was

clear and exact on the topic, however regardless of this I felt that the blurb ought to have been increasingly about the social work hypothesis for training than the subject sorrow. The game plan of data was adequate considering the data that must be accumulated however it would have been exceptional to have less data on the publication. The publication outlined unmistakably that the administration client was the master of their own recuperation and this thus enabled them in using sound judgment, this obviously features the points of interest and hindrances of the individual focused treatment. Trevithick (2012: 91) underlined that social laborers should work with administration clients comprehensively so as to improve comprehension of their life. Administration clients and carers express that the most basic quality they would acknowledge from social specialists is understanding and tolerance.

This I accept was because of the way that social work speculations and administration arrangements shift in their suppositions on the idea of administration clients, their issues, society and job of social laborers. Whittington et al (1995:27) states that "when a social specialist comprehends an issue or issue the individual additionally makes certain suspicions". This is subjectivist reasoning and works with unrestrained choice. It manages insider's view, self deciding ways and human instinct for example managing the relationship that the customer has with the social world around them (Stepney et al 2000). The blurb did not represent the benefits of the use on the specialist this was because of constrained space and just concentrating on the administration client. For example an advisor may not feel burdened while working with an administration client who knows and increasingly positive this will engage the specialist just as the administration client. Rowe and Llic (2009) expressed that "notices are splendid method for moving information and reasonable type of instructive distribution". He further underscored that individuals are bound to be attracted to visual components of a notice than the subject or substance and it was basic for the creator to incorporate their name so as to viably pass on the instructive topic.

As an understudy social laborer I need to basically dissect and assess the social work hypotheses there are six basic criteria's in particular; Subjectivist-objectivist = philosophical position, Theories of society= gives a clarification, Research and research evidence= gives proof and validity to speculations, Ethics and speculations of social equity =provides understanding against the BASW codes of morals and qualities, Service client and carers perspective=an insider point of view and Model of practice= hypotheses are in setting. There are six hypotheses in social work practice to be specific psychodynamic hypothesis, Social learning hypothesis, Theory of good thinking, frameworks hypothesis, strife hypothesis and speculations of cognizance.

The individual Centered methodology was embraced work of the clinician Dr Carl Rogers (1902-1987),the methodology was psychotherapy and advising. He accepted that "the fundamental idea of the person, when working unreservedly, is valuable and trustworthy"(Rogers 1961:94).