Integrate your knowledge of how the brain impacts cognition, emotion, and behavior to critique a popular press article describing the relationship between the brain and a psychological disorder. Compare and contrast the original peer review article being cited by the popular press article with what is being reported.
The popular press article titled “Brain Scans Can Now Spot Depression” by Michaeleen Doucleff for NPR’s Shots blog discusses a recent study published in the journal Nature Medicine that found that brain scans can be used to accurately diagnose depression. The study used functional MRI (fMRI) scans to measure brain activity in people with depression and people without depression. The researchers found that people with depression had less activity in certain areas of the brain, including the hippocampus, the amygdala, and the prefrontal cortex.
The popular press article does a good job of summarizing the key findings of the study. However, it does not provide any details about the methods used in the study or the limitations of the study. For example, the article does not mention that the study only included a small number of participants (24 people with depression and 24 people without depression). This means that the findings of the study may not be generalizable to the larger population of people with depression.
The article also does not mention that the study used fMRI scans, which are expensive and not always available. This means that brain scans are not a practical way to diagnose depression in most cases.
In addition, the article does not discuss the biological mechanisms that may underlie the differences in brain activity between people with depression and people without depression. This is an important area of research that could lead to new treatments for depression.
Overall, the popular press article provides a good overview of the study’s findings, but it does not provide enough detail to fully understand the study or its implications. The article also does not mention some of the limitations of the study.
Here is a comparison of the popular press article with the original peer-reviewed article:
Popular Press Article
Peer-Reviewed Article
Overall, the peer-reviewed article provides a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the study’s findings than the popular press article. The peer-reviewed article provides detailed information about the methods used in the study, the limitations of the study, and the implications of the findings for the understanding and treatment of MDD. The popular press article, on the other hand, provides a more superficial overview of the study’s findings.