Compare and contrast bipolar II from cyclothymic disorder with particular emphasis on how comprehensive assessment could help us to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Use at least 2 references with 5 years.
In order to correctly diagnose either disorder it is important to conduct a comprehensive assessment which should include an evaluation of patient’s medical history along with physical exams so any underlying conditions can be ruled out (Young & Klerman 2014). Additionally, interviews should also be conducted with family members since their perspectives may provide insight into possible symptoms such as irritability or changes in sleeping habits which might not be visible otherwise (Kapalka 2018). Furthermore, screening tests can help identify potential signs of problems whilst self-report questionnaires allow patients themselves to provide feedback regarding their mental well being without relying on diagnostic criteria set forth by psychiatrists (Perugi et al., 2016 ).
To conclude, when faced with these types of bipolar disorders one must take a multi-faceted approach when attempting ascertain whether individual meets criteria for diagnosis. Although clinical judgement will always have its place within psychiatric field, having access detailed records through comprehensive assessments could potentially save time thus allowing treatment begin sooner rather than later, ultimately improving overall prognosis of the affected person.
Bipolar II disorder and cyclothymic disorder are two conditions that differ in their symptoms, prevalence and treatment approach. Both involve symptoms of mood swings, but the intensity is different. Bipolar II involves more severe episodes of depression and hypomania (a less intense version of mania), while cyclothymic disorder involves prolonged periods of elevated or depressed moods with shorter episodes of manic or depressive states. Additionally, bipolar II occurs in approximately 1% of adults worldwide while cyclothymic disorder has been estimated to affect 0.4%–1% of adults in the U.S.
The main way to differentiate between these two disorders is through comprehensive assessment by a trained healthcare provider. A comprehensive assessment typically includes a physical exam, mental health history taking, psychological testing such as using diagnostic questionnaires like the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) or other scales such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) to assess for depression severity and psychotic symptoms, along with lab tests for any underlying medical issues that may be contributing to your symptoms
By and large, “”In old Greece and Rome, before the approaching of Christianity, perspectives toward child murder, dynamic willful extermination, and self destruction had would in general be lenient. Numerous old Greeks and Romans had no fittingly characterized confidence in the intrinsic worth of individual human existence, and agnostic doctors probably performed regular early terminations as well as both deliberate and compulsory benevolence killings. Albeit the Hippocratic Vow restricted specialists from giving ‘a dangerous medication to anyone, not regardless of whether requested,’ or from recommending such a game-plan, barely any old Greek or Roman doctors followed the pledge steadfastly. All through old style relic, there was broad help for deliberate demise rather than delayed anguish, and doctors agreed by frequently giving their patients the toxins they mentioned.” (Dowbiggin) Despite the fact that doctors in old times made a similar vow to save lives, they actually gave out toxins to kill patients. Some say that the justification behind the doctors’ activities were on the grounds that Christianity hadn’t been laid out yet. Thus, the rule of “Thall will not kill,” had not yet been composed.
“Since old times, Jewish and Christian scholars have gone against self destruction as conflicting with the human great and with obligations to God. In the thirteenth hundred years, Thomas Aquinas embraced Catholic showing self destruction in contentions that would impact Christian idea about self destruction for quite a long time. Aquinas denounced self destruction as off-base since it contradicts one’s obligation to oneself and the regular tendency of self-propagation; since it harms others and the local area of which the individual is a section; and in light of the fact that it disregards God’s power over life, which is God’s gift. This position exemplified perspectives about self destruction that won from the Medieval times through the Renaissance and Reconstruction.” (ProCon.org) Despite the fact that the discussion is normally about doctor helped self destruction, the truth of the matter is that the patients are as yet commiting self destruction. In the event that an individual who is of sound psyche and can simply decide, in the event that they are introducing self-destructive considerations, policing each option to mediate the endeavor. On the off chance that that is the situation with regular individuals, for what reason would it be advisable for it be any unique for individuals who are wiped out and in the clinic. Assuming that equivalent individual who was wiped out was out on the planet, and came dependent upon somebody and requested that that individual assist with committing suicide since they essentially don’t have any desire to live any longer, the individual likely wouldn’t help them.
During the late eighteenth Hundred years, “The dismissal of self destruction and willful extermination stayed firm, even after large numbers of the new states decriminalized self destruction following the Progressive Conflict. Most of Americans dismissed self destruction’s precedent-based regulation discipline… yet regardless of how thoughtful they were toward the self destruction’s family, most Americans halted far shy of excusing self-murder. As late as the before the war period there existed in the US a firm agreement… against self destruction and benevolence killing.” (Dowbiggin)
In 1999, a case is Michigan sentenced Jack Kevorkian, MD, of homicide. He was the essential ca