Brainteasers to Stretch your Brain

 

 

After reading the articles, 10 Brainteasers to Stretch your Brain and Are you Solving the Right Problems, respond to the following prompt. (If the link does not work you can google for the article too)

Please share with the class a recent problem you have encountered either at work or in your personal life. Explain the situation, the problem, the steps taken to solve the problem and the outcome. Once finished, re-evaluate the problem using the reframing method discussed in the article, Are You Solving The Right Problems. Share your process of reframing and how your understanding of the problem has changed. If your understanding of the problem has not changed, explain why.

The discussion board is a significant component of your grade. The discussion board is used to demonstrate your understanding of the concepts learned in the text and to reflect on and discuss the material with your classmates. Please make sure you tie the concepts learned each week and throughout the course to support your discussion board posts. The weekly recaps, found on the announcement tab, will be posted at the end of each week. Within the recaps, you will find examples of strong discussion board posts where students did an excellent job answering the questions and supporting their views. Please use these examples to gauge how your posts can be improved each week.

Sample Solution

, Vittola contends war is vital, not just for guarded purposes, ‘since it is legitimate to oppose power with power,’ yet additionally to battle against the treacherous, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting shamefully towards its own kin or have unreasonably taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to “show its foes something new,” however fundamentally to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle’s contention: ‘there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). In any case, Frowe contends “self-protection” has a majority of portrayals, found in Chapter 1, showing that self-preservation can’t continuously legitimize one’s activities. Considerably more risky, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, a totally different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-protection (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more critically, Frowe disproves Vittola’s view on retaliation on the grounds that initially it enables the punisher’s position, yet additionally the present world forestalls this activity between nations through lawful bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a moderately tranquil society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Above all, Frowe further discredits Vittola through his case that ‘right aim can’t be blamed so as to take up arms in light of expected wrong,’ proposing we can’t simply hurt another on the grounds that they have accomplished something uncalled for. Different elements should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality.

Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be stayed away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions strategically. This is upheld by the “final retreat” position in Frowe, where war ought not be allowed except if all actions to look for tact falls flat (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This implies war shouldn’t be pronounced until one party must choose the option to announce battle, to safeguard its domain and freedoms, the point of war. In any case, we can likewise contend that the conflict can never be the final hotel, considering there is dependably a method for attempting to stay away from it, similar to assents or mollification, showing Vittola’s hypothesis is defective.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.