Brownian bridge

 

 

Question 1. Brownian bridge [11 marks]
Consider the process
X_t=B_t-tB_1,0≤t≤1,
where B_t is a standard Brownian Motion.

Show that X_t is a standard Brownian bridge [2 marks].

Determine E[exp(〖1/2 X〗_(3⁄10)+〖2/3 X〗_(7⁄10) )] [3 marks].

Show that E[X_(7⁄10)∨X_(3⁄10) ]=3/7 X_(3⁄10) [3 marks].

Using the result from (c), determine E[X_(3⁄70)^2 X_(7⁄10) ] [3 marks].

 

Question 2. Stationarity [9 marks]
Consider the process
Z_t=〖3X〗_t-1/5 X_(t-1),t∈Z,
where the X_t N(0,1) and independent from each other. Determine if the following processes are strictly stationary and for those that are write down the covariance function.

Y_t=Z_t+Z_(t-1),t∈Z [3 marks].

Y_t=Z_0 Z_(t-1),t∈Z [3 marks].

Y_t=〖cos⁡(t)Z〗_1+〖sin⁡(t)Z〗_3,t∈Z [3 marks].

 

Question 3. MC option pricing [10 marks]
Consider the geometric Brownian Motion (GBM)
S_t=S_0 exp((r-σ^2⁄2)t+σB_t ),0≤t≤T,
where S_0=10, r=1⁄100, σ=1⁄3, T=2 and B_t is a standard Brownian motion.

An example of a discretely-monitored Asian call option with European payoff has price at t=0 given by
A=e^(-rT) E[max(1/24 ∑_(j=1)^24▒S_(j⁄12) -K,0)]
where K=8.

Taking n=〖10〗^5, use Mathematica to calculate the crude Monte Carlo estimate
A_n=e^(-rT)/n ∑_(k=1)^n▒max(1/24 ∑_(j=1)^24▒S_(j⁄12)^((k) ) -K,0)
e^(-rT)/n ∑_(k=1)^n▒max(1/24 ∑_(k=1)^24▒〖S_0 exp((r-σ^2⁄2)t+σB_(j⁄12)^((k) ) ) 〗-K,0)
where S_t^((k) ), B_t^((k) ) are random samples of S_t and B_t respectively [4 marks]. Also calculate the sample estimate of var(C_n ) [1 mark].

Taking n=〖10〗^5, use R to calculate the control variate Monte Carlo estimate
A ~_n=A_n-a(C_n-C)
where the expected value of the control variate is given by the Black-Sholes European vanilla call price formula
C=Φ(d_1 ) S_0-e^(-rT) Φ(d_2 )K
with
d_1=1/(σ√T) (ln S_0/K+(r+σ^2⁄2)T),
d_2=d_1-σ√T,
Φ(z)=P(Z≤z)forZ N(0,1)
and the crude MC estimate of the control variate
C_n=e^(-rT)/n ∑_(k=1)^n▒max(S_2^((k) )-K,0)
e^(-rT)/n ∑_(k=1)^n▒〖max(S_0 exp((r-σ^2⁄2)t+σB_2^((k) ) )-K,0).〗

 

Question 4. Markov chains [10 marks]
You may use computational software for calculations, but express your answers using proper mathematical notation.

Let X_t, t∈{1,2,…}, be a homogenous Markov chain taking states X_t∈{1,2,…,5} with one-step transitional probability matrix and initial distribution
P=(■(1/10&3/10&0&2/5&1/5@1/5&0&0&2/5&2/5@1/6&1/3&1/6&1/6&1/6@1/8&1/8&1/4&0&1/2@0&1/3&1/3&0&1/3)),p(0)=(■(1/10@1/4@1/10@1/4@3/10))
respectively.

Calculate var(X_7 ) [2 marks].

Calculate a stationary distribution π [2 marks].

Let Y_t, t≥0, be a homogenous Markov chain taking states Y_t∈{1,2,…,5} with generator matrix
A=(■(0&0&0&0&0@1/4&-1&3/8&1/8&1/4@1&1/2&-3&1/4&5/4@1/6&1/6&1/6&-1&1/2@0&0&0&0&0)).

What is the probability of the state change 3⟶4 when the Markov chain jumps [2 marks]?

Let Y_4=3 and let the waiting time
T_3=min(s>0∨Y_(4+s)≠3).
What is E[T_3^2 ] [2 marks]?

A Markov chain is ergodic if the limit of the state probability vector, 〖lim〗┬(t→∞)⁡p(t), exists and does not depend on p(t). Using this criterion, determine if Y_t ergodic [2 marks]?

 

Question 5. ARMA processes [10 marks]
Consider the process
X_t-13/12 X_(t-1)-13/24 X_(t-2)+5/8 X_(t-3)=Z_t-67/36 Z_(t-1)-41/72 Z_(t-2)+5/3 Z_(t-3),t∈Z
where Z_t, t∈Z, is a zero-mean white-noise process with variance σ^2.

The process above is not stationary. Explain why [2 marks] and identify an appropriate ARIMA(p,d,q) model [2 marks].

Describe how the ARIMA(p,d,q) model from (a) could be converted to an ARMA(p,q) model [2 marks].

Determine if the ARMA(p,q) from (b) is invertible [2 marks].

Plot the ARIMA(p,d,q) and ARMA(p,q) models identified in (a) and (b) respectively with var(Z_t )=σ^2=1 [2 marks]?

 

Question 6. Diffusion processes [10 marks]
Consider the diffusion process
X_t=(1+t^2 ) B_t,t≥0,
where B_t is a standard Brownian motion.

Using the definition
a(t,x)=〖lim〗┬(h→0)⁡〖E[X_(t+h)-X_t∨X_t=x]/h〗,
find the drift coefficient of X_t [3 marks].

Find the diffusion coefficient of X_t using the Ito formula [2 marks].

Write down the Kolmogorov backward equation for the transition density function p(y,t∨x,s) of the process X_t [2 marks].

Define the process
S_t=e^(X_t ),t≥0,
with X_t as above.

Using the Ito formula, write down the stochastic differential equation of the process S_t [3 marks].

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

proved. (Mill 2006: 259) His justification for colonialism in “Considerations” is therefore a great contradiction to his commitment to individual liberty. This suggests that his view that colonialism led to more individual liberty for the people was an idea rather than a definitive policy. (Isak 2007: 359-400). Mill’s justification that colonialism will nurture the people to adopt the principle of individual liberty also contradicts all his arguments for non-intervention in the case of a civilised nation; that liberty must be gained through an arduous struggle and that aid by a foreign power to obtain liberty has negative long term affects. Firstly, it could be argued that if an arduous struggle is the only way people can gain liberty, then how are the British going to artificially prepare the people for liberty? Secondly, there were examples of arduous struggles against British rule in India and yet Mill still supported British control over these people. For example, the Sepoy Mutiny in India in 1857-59 involved the majority of the population. (Ryan 2014: 1-14) To add to this great contradiction, the same year (1859) as the mutiny Mill even wrote in “A Few Words on Non-Intervention” about how people must be given self-rule if they fight for it. (Mill 2006: 262) Although Mill may argue that these “barbarians” are not yet civilised enough to know that they want this freedom, Hamburger questions how Mill is to judge who is ready to decide their own governance through individual liberty? (Hamburger 1999 in Tunick 2006: 601). A further contradiction is Mill’s belief that it is unfair for a foreign power to prevent the people from overthrowing it and he even believes foreign oppression would warrant an invasion from another foreign power to correct the imbalance and create a fair struggle. (Mill 2006: 262) Tunick has tried to argue that there was greater corruption in India prior to British rule hence at least the British gave the people a chance of gaining liberty which they would not have had. (Tunick 2006: 601) However, this argument actually contradicts Mills belief that foreign intervention in this situation was unhealthy, as the State could easily become reliant on foreign support and this could lead to another civil war or oppressive government when the foreign power leaves. Hence, if foreign control could lead to this situation, this clearly would not give the people more liberty and this undermines Mills argument that the local people of India will one day have been pedagogically coerced enough to be able to take over from British rule. Furthermore, through imposing British ideas of individual liberty on these “uncivilised” communities he is being narrow minded in assuming he knows what is best for these countries and is in fact taking away the liberty of these people to decide how they interact. This is because his arguments are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the culture of Asia and Africa, which put a greater emphasis on social obligation. (Doyle 2009: 365) What’s more, through Mill’s assumption that he can educate the Indians to want self-rule and individual liberty he is contradicting his own idea that the demand for change must come from within the country. Based on this argument surely the colonisers should have suggested the idea of individual liberty, instead of imposing it, so that the people were more likely to fight to maintain this liberty as they had chosen it themselves. Mill’s response to this would be that they are not yet capable of deciding this for themselves, but it could equally be argued that slaves can only learn to be free when they are given freedom.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.