‘Cancel culture’

To what extent has ‘cancel culture’ affected free speech? What is its impact on individuals and businesses?

Sample Solution

Cancel culture

Cancel culture refers to the popular practice of withdrawing support for [cancelling] public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. Public shaming is in no way new, but the internet has made the process of cancelling even more potent and widespread. More recently, the phenomenon has led to firings, resignations and boycotts amid the country’s views on race. TV shows were pulled off the air because of onscreen depictions of police. Writers lost their jobs at prominent publications because of their controversial views [Julia Munslow, July 19, 2020]. The original objective of cancel culture may have been an endeavor for justice, as well as the accountability of persons/brands/entities and what they stood for. However, the consumer voice now seems to have developed into armchair activism, where consumers with a mob mentality mete out quick, and harsh judgments, sometimes even bordering on hate.

health of democracy” (Gentzkow et al. 2980) and they maintained the relationship between the people and the president.
In the 1920s the introduction of new technologies brought with it new communications tools that would change how people received, interacted and discussed information. The introduction of the radio gradually reduced the importance of the newspaper, especially as they came down in price, because news spread much more quickly and immediately over the radio than was the case with newspapers. “Radio coverage of presidential campaigns began in 1924 and expanded dramatically in the 1930s” (Gentzkow et al. 2986) and the first president to publicly communicate to the country in real time was Calvin Coolidge, in 1923 through the use of the radio (Morgan RealClear.com).
Public expectations of presidents changed with the introduction of the radio. During the golden age of American newspapers, public expectations of presidents were distinguished by the way they looked and what they were said to have said. With the introduction of radio, public expectations of presidents began to be shaped by how they talked and how they were perceived to behave, through speech. This changed the character of the presidency. “Public expectations of presidential communication formed in conjunction with the development of a more public rhetorical presidency at the beginning of the 20th century” (Scacco and Coe 302) and have continued to operate since that time. The concept of a rhetorical presidency is derived from political communication theory and is argued to be witnessed when “a decline in party strength and a changing media environment led presidents to bypass the bargaining processing in DC and “go public” with their policies instead” (Pluta 2). Rhetorical presidencies began in the 1930s, when Roosevelt, facing strong Congressional opposition to the New Deal policies that he was espousing to defeat the Great Depression, used radio to create a stronger relationship with the American people by appe

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.