Capital Budgeting Practice

 

 

Assume you have just retired as the CEO of a successful company. A major publisher has offered you a book deal. The publisher will pay you $1 million upfront if you agree to write a book about your experiences. You estimate that it will take three years to write the book. The time you spend writing will cause you to give up speaking engagements amounting to $500,000 per year. You estimate your opportunity cost to be 10%.
Should you accept this deal? Plot a diagram that measures NPV (on the y-axis) vs. discount rate (on the x-axis) to solve this problem. (Hint: Have your scale on the x-axis go to 50% (discount rate)).
Determine the IRR for this deal. (Hint: IRR is the point at which NPV = 0)
Suppose you inform the publisher that it needs to sweeten the deal before you will accept it. The publisher offers $550,000 advance and $1,000,000 in four years when the book is published.
Should you accept or reject the new offer? Again, plot a diagram that measures NVP (on the y-axis) vs. discount rate (on the x-axis) to solve this problem. (Hint: Have your scale on the x-axis go to 50% (discount rate)).
Determine the IRRs for this deal (Hint: There are two IRRs for this problem).
Discuss if the IRR rule for making budgetary decisions can be used in this case.
Finally, you are able to get the publisher to increase your advance to $750,000, in addition to the $1 million when the book is published in four years.
Should you accept or reject this new offer? Again, plot a diagram that measures NVP (on the y-axis) vs. discount rate (on the x-axis) to solve this problem. (Hint: Have your scale on the x-axis go to 50% (discount rate)).
Determine the IRR for this deal.
State three conclusions regarding the use of IRR vs. NPV that you can make from questions 2-4. Which is the stronger method to use (IRR or NPV), and why?

Sample Solution

Initial Offer:

  • Upfront payment: $1,000,000
  • Opportunity cost per year: $500,000
  • Writing time: 3 years
  • Discount rate: 10%

NPV Analysis:

  • Year 0: +$1,000,000
  • Year 1: -$500,000 / (1 + 0.1) = -$454,545.45
  • Year 2: -$500,000 / (1 + 0.1)^2 = -$412,146.41
  • Year 3: -$500,000 / (1 + 0.1)^3 = -$372,230.61
  • NPV = $1,000,000 – $454,545.45 – $412,146.41 – $372,230.61 = $160,077.53

IRR Calculation:

Using a financial calculator or spreadsheet, the IRR for this offer is approximately 12.6%.

Conclusion: The NPV is positive ($160,077.53), indicating accepting the offer would create value. However, the IRR (12.6%) is slightly higher than the opportunity cost (10%), suggesting the return might not be optimal compared to alternative investments.

Revised Offer:

  • Upfront payment: $550,000
  • Payment in year 4: $1,000,000

NPV Analysis:

  • Year 0: +$550,000
  • Year 4: +$1,000,000 / (1 + 0.1)^4 = $772,186.92
  • NPV = $550,000 + $772,186.92 = $1,322,186.92

IRR Calculation:

There are two IRRs for this offer: approximately 14.3% and 36.4%. The lower IRR represents the minimum discount rate at which the project breaks even, while the higher IRR indicates a reinvestment rate that would also satisfy the NPV requirement.

Conclusion: Both NPV ($1,322,186.92) and IRR (14.3%) are favorable, suggesting this offer creates more value than the initial one.

Third Offer:

  • Upfront payment: $750,000
  • Payment in year 4: $1,000,000

NPV Analysis:

  • Year 0: +$750,000
  • Year 4: +$1,000,000 / (1 + 0.1)^4 = $772,186.92
  • NPV = $750,000 + $772,186.92 = $1,522,186.92

IRR Calculation:

The IRR for this offer is approximately 18.9%, indicating a very attractive return on investment.

Conclusion: With an NPV of $1,522,186.92 and an IRR of 18.9%, this offer provides the highest financial benefit compared to the others.

NPV vs. IRR:

  • NPV: Considers the cash flow across the entire project and provides a clear monetary value of the investment. It remains consistent at different discount rates.
  • IRR: Reflects the internal rate of return on the investment. It can be multiple for complex cash flows like the revised offer.

Choosing Between Methods:

  • IRR should be used with caution:
    • It can lead to incorrect decisions when there are multiple IRRs or non-monetary considerations.
    • It relies on reinvesting cash flows at the IRR, which might not be possible.
  • NPV is generally preferred:
    • It provides a clear dollar value of the investment’s worth.
    • It is easier to interpret and compare across different projects.

Final Decision:

Based on the NPV analysis, you should reject the initial offer and accept the final offer, as it provides the highest potential return ($1,522,186.92) and exceeds your opportunity cost.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.