Capsim Competition Rounds.

at
Categories
Tags

 

Students are to answer the following questions regarding the Capsim Competition Rounds.
Support your paper with at least three (3) scholarly resources, the course text (Harvard Business Review), and the Holy Bible. In addition to these specified
resources, other appropriate resources may be included. The final paper/Critical Assignment submission must be completed using APA standards (i.e.
abstract, headers, in-text citations, reference page, etc.).
Final Paper/Critical Assignment Length: 7 pages (not including the title page, abstract, or reference page).
Individual Section Length: Each section must be a least 1 page.
Each question must precede your answer (questions preceding answers do not count toward the 7-page minimum).
One student from each group must submit this paper on behalf of the entire group.
1. Describe two problems that you came across while completing the Competition Rounds. Answer the following questions for each problem:
a. What was the problem?
b. Where/how did you identify the problem?
c. What were the effects of the problem?
d. What are the root causes of the problem?
e. What strategy applies to solving the problem?
2. Describe two successes (favorable outcomes) that you came across while completing the Competition Rounds. Answer the following questions for each
problem:
a. What was the favorable outcome?
b. Where/how did you identify the favorable outcome?
c. How can the favorable outcome be repeated?
d. What are the root causes of the favorable outcome?
e. What strategy applies to achieving the favorable outcome?
3. What three recommendations would you give to others starting the Capsim Competition Rounds? Why?
4. What three key concepts are you taking away that will positively affect how you work? How?
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exemplary (90.00 to 100%)
Accomplished (80.00 to 89.00%)
Developing (70.00 to 79.00%)
Beginning (60.00 to 69.00%)
Unsatisfactory (0.00 to 59.00%)
Grading Dimension 1 Click for more options
Weight 22.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
Completely and correctly addresses/answers all five statements and sub-questions found in question #1.
80.00 to 89.00 %
Completely and correctly addresses/answers four of the five statements and sub-questions found in question #1.
70.00 to 79.00 %
Answers are incomplete or incorrect and/or two or sub-questions are not answered.
60.00 to 69.00 %
Answers are incomplete or incorrect and/or three or sub-questions are not answered.
0.00 to 59.00 %
Requirement unmet
Grading Dimension 2 Click for more options
Weight 22.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
Completely and correctly addresses/answers all five statements and sub-questions found in question #2.
80.00 to 89.00 %
Completely and correctly addresses/answers four of the five statements and sub-questions found in question #2.
70.00 to 79.00 %
Answers are incomplete or incorrect and/or two or sub-questions are not answered.
60.00 to 69.00 %
Answers are incomplete or incorrect and/or three or sub-questions are not answered.
0.00 to 59.00 %
Requirement unmet
Grading Dimension 3 Click for more options
Weight 22.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
Thoroughly provides three specific recommendations to others starting the Capsim Competition Rounds. A thorough explanation as to why each specific
recommendation was sele

 

Sample Solution

proficient and compelling results. John Kotter clarifies that a few powers for change are more noteworthy monetary coordination, development and log jam, innovation, and fall of communist nations and their reorientation toward industrialist economies (Palmer, 2006).

Several change management theories depict the way toward building up an arranged way to deal with the progressions occurred in an association. The principal display is John Kotter’s 8 stages, which was distributed in 1995 in the Harvard Business Review. Initially, setting up the requirement for direness alludes to performing market examination by deciding the issues and openings. The second step, guaranteeing there is a ground-breaking change gathering to direct the change can be performed by making group structures to help drive the change and ensuring the groups have adequate capacity to manage the change. Thirdly, building up a dream can be done by giving concentration to change. At that point, the vision must be conveyed by utilizing different channels to continually impart this vision. The following stage is enabling the staff by evacuating authoritative approaches and structures that restrain the accomplishment of the vision. When this is done, the association must engage the staffs which helps bolster the requirement for change and give inspiration. Merging increases is the seventh step.

Nonetheless, while the Kotter’s 8 stages plot the administration of an authoritative change, the Bridges Transition Model proposes that change won’t be fruitful if progress doesn’t happen. For this situation, progress is characterized as the consummation of something, which is the main stage. The second stage is the nonpartisan zone, which is a confounding state between the old reality and the new. Amid this stage, individuals are not prepared or agreeable to welcome the fresh starts. Much significance must be given amid this stage, on the grounds that the change may be endangered if the association chooses to rashly get away. Although, if the unbiased zone is finished effectively, numerous open doors for innovative change can be exhibited. The last stage is acknowledgment of the fresh starts and distinguishing

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?