Case Analysis

 

 

 

 

Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service. Around the company, Dave is known as sort of a hothead. During his previous employment at another company, Dave had been involved in a workplace fistfight with a fellow employee, resulting in criminal charges.

One day, between deliveries and in a company vehicle, Dave decides to get lunch. While leaving the parking lot at Big Burrito Bistro, the favorite lunch spot for most Empire Courier employees, Dave negligently causes a car accident with another vehicle, resulting in injuries to Victor, the driver of the other car. As Dave and Victor are waiting on the side of the road for the police to arrive, Victor comments to Dave, “Oh, you drive for Empire Courier Service. It doesn’t surprise me that Empire hires bad drivers because their service stinks, and their prices are too high!” Dave is so offended that Victor would insult his employer’s professional reputation that he punches Victor in the face, causing Victor to suffer even more injuries. Empire Courier Service does not, as a matter of policy, do criminal background checks on its employees.
Within your paper, define agency and how an agency relationship is created. Identify the various types of agency relationships, and explain tort liability and how it relates to the agency relationship.
Then, considering the legal principles discussed in Chapter 20, explain who is liable for Dave’s negligence for causing the car accident, and explain who is liable for Dave’s intentional tort for punching Victor.
Provide your answers in a case analysis of at least two pages in length.
One source is required. Include an introduction in your paper. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment. APA formatting, however, is not necessary.

Sample Solution

know of any impediment, to say them now, Claudio responds “What man was he talked with you yesternight, out at your window betwixt twelve and one?,” hero responds, “I talked with no man at that hour, my lord”. Through the use of irony Shakespeare conveys that Hero tells nothing but the truth, however acquaintances including Claudio choose to doubt her and believe the men who witnessed it. If Claudio abandoned his ignorant attitude and listened to what Hero really had to say, they would’ve come to a realization that everything was a lie. Moreover, the play is full of dramatic irony where we know that characters are being deceived while they are not aware of what is really happening. In this case, we know that Hero has been disgraced, and it’s shown how the love between Claudio and Hero deteriorates.
Hero’s humiliation was enough to affect Leonato and his daughter, causing them to conduct an act of revenge towards Claudio. Friar proposed that Hero pretended to be dead, in the eyes of her friends and family to make Claudio grief. In act 5 scene 3, Leonato asked Claudio to write a epitaph, which stated “Give her fame which never dies, so the life that died with shame, lives in death with glorious fame”. Shakespeare utilizes an oxymoron to demonstrates what Claudio is feeling after finding out that he is guilty of Hero’s death, his love for Hero remains strong and he now desires to bring her back with a clean record.

To summarize, lies play a huge role in the play Much Ado About Nothing due to Shakespeare’s tendency to focus on love, relationships and friendships and how they are affected by deceit. Through the characters stories, the message he is trying to convey becomes apparent which is that honesty is the only way to avoid issues that may result in serious consequences. As the play progresses many cases of deceit are present, and characters respond differently.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.