CASE STUDY: CHALLENGES FACING URBAN PLANNERS

 

1) Analyze several of the Critical Challenges Facing an Urban Planner What are they? [See below] How do they affect the planning process? Why do they affect the planning process? What are second-order consequences? Some Challenges (pressures that exert a decisive influence on an planning organization’s likelihood of future success.) • Disruptive innovations • Financing Difficulties • Fragmented and overlapping governments, authorities, and special districts • Untangling organizational purpose and organizational strategy • Social conflicts​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​, and rapid population growth • The spread of scattered new development • Outdated planning and zoning techniques • Incorporating “what people think” (reputation and the social definition of value) in strategic planning 2) Analyze the Solutions to each Planning and Development Challenge selected (What are they How will they work? What are the impacts and second order consequences?) 3) Analyze the Partnerships That Can Mitigate, or Address each Planning and Development Challenges selected using a biblical worldview (What parties are involved in the comprehensive planning process? What do they contribute? What purpose do they serve? What are the impacts and second order consequences​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ of their involvement?)

Sample Solution

CASE STUDY: CHALLENGES FACING URBAN PLANNERS

Urban planning is a large-scale concept concerned with planning and development at all levels (architectural, infrastructural, ecological, economic, and even political). During this process many problems and obstacles come up but luckily the same as any other kind of problems, there are solutions and precautions. Challenges facing urban planning include financial difficulties, social conflicts, and rapid population growth. The city planner cannot exactly say the future changes that may affect the city. But he/she can anticipate some of the changes and provide for it in the plan. the planner can only gamble by anticipating the future growth and recommending some things that may conform to the needs of the people in the long run.

situation is extremely useful in understanding the fundamentals of leadership (Pettinger, 2007). Chelladurai in his Multi Dimensional Model of Leadership, expands on much of Fiedler’s theory but in a continuum based approach, in which the leader can adapt their leadership style to fit the situation (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). Chelladurai’s theory is taken from sports psychology but can be applied to an organisational scenario. It provides a much more empirical categorisation of task structure, clearly differentiating a plethora of situations that require certain leadership styles for success. Chealldurai found three characteristics that affect the leadership style required for a situation, called antecedents, they mainly expand upon Fiedler’s situational factors and leader – member relations and ultimately affect how a leader should behave towards a situation. The first are situational characteristics, the environment in which the leader must perform, the second are leader characteristics, the experience, personal qualities and skills of the leader, and the third are member characteristics, the motivation, skill and experience levels of group members (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). The situational characteristics and member characteristics have a required behaviour to ensure maximum group performance, they also have a preferred behaviour to ensure the satisfaction of group members, if the leaders actual behaviour matches both the required behaviour and preferred behaviour of the situation the consequence is maximum group performance and satisfaction. However, if the group are not performing and achieving goals or are not satisfied or both, then the leader is able to amend their actual behaviour to improve this. Leaders able to monitor performance and satisfaction, and understand what is required to amend the situation will achieve optimum group performance in Chelladurai’s model.
The one limitation of Chealldurai’s model is that it assumes the leader is in a position of complete positional power over the group, and can implement any leadership style of their choosing without constraints. Positional power is the authority and influence a leader has over a group, if the leader has positional power, they will be able to implement the leadership style they best see fit for the situation. Positional power cannot be measured or quantified, making it highly ambiguous and hard for a leader to understand whether they have it or how then can gain it. It becomes t

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.