Case Study Critique

 

 

You are required to write a critique on two case studies in this course as outlined in your required reading. Your critique should discuss the major facts of the case and should tell whether you believe the right decision(s) was/were made and why. Doing so not only further develops and demonstrates strong critical thinking skills, but also broadens your awareness and understanding of issues facing today’s public administrators.

Instructions

The format of each case study critique should be as follows:

· Identify the important facts in the case study.

· What decision(s) were made in the case study.

· Do you believe the decisions were appropriate?

· Discuss any alternative solution(s) to the problem and support those solutions with additional research (with similar cases).

Sample Solution

experienced and great practices carried out under the ongoing regulative system. To address obtainment issues, the review suggests: (1) seeking after purposeful speculations on and having a political will for frameworks change and hierarchical culture change; (2) more noteworthy venture on arranging and other preliminary exercises before the genuine acquisition; (3) development direction in open acquirement; and (4) an incentive for-cash obtainment.

1. Seek after purposeful ventures on and have a political will for frameworks change and hierarchical culture change:

The DPWH under the rudder of previous Secretary Singson is an illustration of this. at the point when the public authority was seriously reprimanded by numerous partners for the postpones in the execution of foundation projects in 2011, the secretary of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) promised to establish an organization change program which will lessen debasement, further develop effectiveness, advance assets and understand a generally authoritative culture change (DPWH 2013). The DPWH then executed significant changes given this mantra: to carry out the perfect ventures at the ideal expense and with the right quality, and for these to be conveyed exactly on schedule and completed by the perfect individuals. For instance, in the obtainment cycle, the organization eliminated the necessity for project workers to present a Letter of Intent in order to forestall conspiracy. It additionally worked on the offering system by requiring just five reports, rather than the past 20 archives. Submitting 20 records in the past gave a great deal of space to watchfulness and open doors for preclusion to incline toward a bidder. The DPWH additionally executed the “grouping of tasks”, that is, related projects are joined and bundled into greater agreement bundles to draw in skilled workers for hire. In the space of venture the board, the organization additionally settled standard expense assessment manuals for streets, extensions and structures. It likewise assembled, spread and refreshed cost information on development materials from one side of the country to the other. It additionally embraced norms on development span by sort of venture. Before the changes were sought after, there was wide changeability in unit costs and there was no standard development term. The DPWH additionally tapped outsiders as accomplices. It authorize 52 common society association accomplices as accomplices in the various phases of the undertaking life cycle. It is likewise reevaluated a few undertaking review and quality confirmation administrations. The office likewise set up an electronic interchanges framework for getting, answering to, and making a move on any grievance, inquiry, or idea. It additionally led specific and purposive evaluating by focusing on the most weak regions and giving assents to authorities with significant breaches. As an issue of strategy, it additionally enco

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.