Causes of poverty

at
Categories
Tags

 

Euchner and McGovern discuss causes of poverty from the “levels” of the individual, family and community, society, and the economy (ignore the level of government for this ). Answer the following questions in the :
1. In what ways do each of those levels contribute to poverty? Be specific and provide examples from the readings.
2. Which level do you think explains the causes of poverty the most effectively? Why?
3. Given your analysis, what policy or policies should be put in place to deal with poverty? Do you think that things would still need to be done to address the other levels? Be specific and provide examples from the readings.

 

Sample Solution

Causes of poverty

Poverty is a complex problem. A proper definition of poverty must address the many different types of poverty and acknowledge that poverty is hunger and lack of shelter, illiteracy and not having access to school, being sick and unable to see a doctor, living one day at a time and feeling completely powerless and trapped by things beyond one`s control. Like most social problems, poverty has many dimensions. We can understand poverty by adopting a levels analysis, that is, by looking at how specific dynamics affect poverty at the levels of the individual, family and community, society, and economy. At the level of the individual, we can identify a number of characteristics that account for poverty, such as lack of education, lack of access to jobs, abuse of alcohol and drugs, medical problems and disabilities, and depression and other psychological problems.

may have several provisions detailing and highlighting some of the cases. One may find doxers guilty of breaking specific statutes or standing orders especially about the methods used to obtain and disseminate the information. For instance, a doxer may have threatened or blackmailed a venerable member of the family of their intended target . Similarly, the doxer may have sent goons to attack the subject which violates the law. Therefore, these legal provisions should be sought after, explored and exhausted before further actions are taken. Unfortunately, the lack of exact legal guidelines in most jurisdictions makes such civil suits challenging to win or very expensive to sustain. Public outcry may then be employed to force the lawmakers to provide absolute and strict privacy laws and to propose more sombre punitive actions for doxing innocent individuals .

Even so, skilled but wicked hackers may still manage to circumnavigate the efforts and firewalls placed to lock them out. Nonetheless, as aforesaid, doxing doxers is an acceptable countermeasure to reduce the spread of the vice and its consequential effects. Social media owners should hire talented personnel to gather and compile a database with all potential and reported doxers. These hired staff should then use the information on their database to shame, ostracize, hack and expose the doxers who intended to dox other innocent individuals. The tit-for-tat approach would discourage others who planned on engaging in the practice in the future.

Lastly, official or extralegal capital punishment would serve best to countermeasure the irritating doxing menace. The proposal will receive massive support from all individuals who have been victimized by malicious doxing and all those who are opposed to doxing by all means. A general look at this countermeasure of killing someone for an action that does not directly cause the death of another may seem unproportionable. However, historians will argue that the same analogy was effectively applied in the 19th century to limit livestock theft in America and Europe . Domestic animals were vital in a homestead. The animals provided food, labor, transportation and other products for use in the family such as wool. Therefore, losing even one of th

This question has been answered.

Get Answer