Characteristics of diverse groups of individuals

 

As the workforce becomes more and more diverse, some might find it difficult to remain current on the characteristics of diverse groups of individuals. Indeed, it is not expected of you to have a degree in diversity, but one of the best ways to gain knowledge is by sharing knowledge. Let’s begin by first examining the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s website.

The EEOC is a federal entity tasked with enforcing federal laws that govern the discrimination against applicants or employees on the basis of “race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, transgender status, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information” (EEOC, n.d., n.p.). They have the power to investigate claims of discrimination against employers that are required to abide by federal standards. This can often differ for private companies that do not fall under the realm of federal control. Visit Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s website.

Part I: Your Experience

Talk about an experience you have had with a diverse population. If you have not had any experience working with diverse populations, locate a recent news article/video where there was an issue working with a diverse population. (Be sure and keep your experiences anonymous to protect organizations and individuals.)

Consider the following questions:

What were the positives in the approach your leader used to address the situation?

Which portion of the EEOC website might be applicable to your situation?

What were the lessons learned?

Part II: Respond to Peers

Please meaningfully engage with at least two peers to move the conversation forward. Share insights about what they said, ask questions, share experiences, etc.

Assignment Guidelines

Actively monitor your own discussion thread throughout the week and respond as appropriate. Review the discussion rubric to learn how to maximize your points.

Sample Solution

JJC. In processing low-level cases in precisely the same manner as more serious cases, BPD exposes young people to the harmful effects of arrest, which may create more harm than good to the young person and the interests of public safety

The DJS’s annual Data Resource Guide indicates that “juvenile detention may be authorized by DJS intake officers on a temporary basis at the request of a law enforcement officer . . . .” The resource guide further depicts that only after being taken into custody and screened for diversion at the law enforcement level, DJS performs a screening for secure detention admission using the DRAI detention screen on a young person only after the police officer requests secure detention. However, CCLP was unable to confirm that youth were screened for detention only if detention was requested by law enforcement. Indeed, stakeholder interviews revealed that it is common practice for DJS intake to conduct the DRAI screening for all youth brought to the BCJJC by law enforcement, even youth who will eventually be diverted.

This is concerning for a number of reasons. Again, processing low-level cases in the manner that is appropriate for more serious cases can expose a young person to undue harm. In addition to the harms associated with arrest and transport, extensive and unnecessary processing once at the BCJJC exposes the young person to further detriment and keeps the young person separated from home, school, and community. Also, once DJS performs the RAI screen, the information gathered and score that is generated will remain a part of the young person’s juvenile justice history and may influence processing and case disposition should the young person come into contact with the justice system at a later time.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.