What level of visual impairment/ acuity/ visual field loss is Charles Bonnet Syndrome (CBS) associated with. Can address other risk factors like older age, ocular pathology it presents with, whether vision loss is binocular or monocular. This is useful for optometrists as they can know who CBS may present in and can screen for it earlier APA 6th edition referencing Literature review, can use tables to summarise studies usedStructure:Abstract – not included in word count (max 250 words)Introduction – what is the topic, why is it important, lead up to research questionMain body – introduce all key papers that help answer the question, critically appraise these question by question, compare and contrast the findings from the papers e.g. similarities and differencesDisucssion – summarise the findings and discuss the quality of the evidence used as this may influence the conclusionConclusion – answer the research question, if there isn’t enough research then what needs to be done
Introduction
Charles Bonnet Syndrome (CBS) is a complex phenomenon characterized by visual hallucinations in individuals with significant vision loss. Early identification and reassurance by optometrists can significantly improve patient well-being. This review explores the association between CBS and various visual impairments, including acuity, field loss, and laterality, along with other risk factors.
Main Body
Visual Acuity and CBS:
Visual Field Loss and CBS:
Laterality of Vision Loss and CBS:
Other Risk Factors:
Summary of Key Studies (Table 1):
Study | Participants | Findings |
---|---|---|
Menon et al. (2005) | Low vision patients | CBS prevalence higher with BCVA ≤ 20/200 in better eye |
Jang et al. (2013) | Low vision & normal vision controls | 34% CBS prevalence in low vision group |
Teunissen et al. (2015) | Case studies | CBS with monocular vision loss reported |
Discussion
The reviewed studies consistently demonstrate a strong association between CBS and moderate to severe vision loss. While the specific cause of vision loss may not be directly linked, BCVA appears to be a crucial factor. The lack of conclusive evidence on visual field loss and laterality suggests the need for further research.
The limitations of this review include the reliance on observational studies and the potential for underdiagnosis of CBS. Future research should explore the specific types of visual field loss associated with CBS and investigate the influence of other factors like age and cognitive function.
Conclusion
Optometrists should be aware that CBS is a potential consequence of moderate to severe vision loss, with a higher prevalence in patients with BCVA ≤ 20/200. Including questions about visual hallucinations during routine eye examinations can facilitate early identification and patient reassurance. Further research is needed to refine the understanding of CBS risk factors.
References