Cincinnatus as a Roman model

at
Categories
Tags

 

PURPOSE OF PAPER: To investigate/research a topic and to analyze and draw conclusions about the historical significance of the event, personality, movement, or theme.
FAULTS & PENALTIES: Contractions such as, ‘isn’t; don’t; won’t; can’t; wouldn’t, etc. 3 point penalty per instance After 3 misspellings in the paper, 3 points per instance First person pronoun, 3 points per instance Slang, or informal speech 3 points per instance Paper length (excluding cover sheet or Works Cited or Endnotes) less than three full pages, 3 points per quarter page (at the sole discretion of the instructor) Submittal as a PDF, or Apple Pages, or any other format than Microsoft Word, 5 points Too many quotes — no more than 3 of two sentences or less permitted — 15 points

 

Sample Solution

Cincinnatus was an influential figure in Roman history who exemplified the virtues of leadership and service to his country. He is best known for being appointed dictator of Rome in 458 BC when it was threatened by a nearby enemy tribe, the Aequi. Despite having all power at his disposal, Cincinnatus voluntarily relinquished it just sixteen days later after successfully repelling the threat. This act of humility struck a chord with many generations afterwards, inspiring them to emulate similar values such as selflessness and dedication to public good (Kagan). The legend has since been used throughout Western culture to help explain the importance of taking moral high ground even when victory looks like a possibility at hand(Meier 22). This message resonates even today where it still serves as a reminder to not only be responsible individuals but also to put collective needs before your own too. Additionally, Cincinnatus’ legacy remains strong in modern names like ‘Cincinnati’ which itself signifies bond between past and present generations alike(Lazebnik). Finally, however we interpret this myth ultimately remains open up to interpretation—with each individual free to draw their own conclusions depending upon their own beliefs and standpoints. Overall, then it’s easy to see why figures such as Cincinnatus continues to inspire us even today–not only does it have deep roots within wider European cultural landscape, but also provides interesting insights into the past without relying upon exaggerations or embellishments found elsewhere in popular literature too.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer