Class and social mobility

 

 

 

 

You will write an opinion piece of no more than 1,200 words on a basic fact related to poverty or inequality. You
are expected to present the best scientific research available on this fact and answer how this fact informs our
understanding of inequality. You can draw on the readings, class lectures, or other scientific evidence when
completing this assignment. The key here is clarity and brevity while expressing an opinion based on scientific
evidence.
Instructions
Lede (news hook, first sentence crucial), 2 points
Thesis (argument), 2 points
Argument (based on evidence), 10 points
“To Be Sure” (address obvious counter-arguments), 2 points
Conclusions (circling back to the lede), 2 points
Citations, 2 points
Source

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/07/social-mobility-america/491240/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103115000062
http://people.duke.edu/~bl38/articles/middleclass.pdf

APPLY FOR THIS CASE 
Lowest Bid Suggested: $7.43
Reason:
Price:

 

 

Sample Solution

Class and social mobility
Poverty holds a seemingly unbreakable grip on families, neighborhoods, cities, and entire countries. It stretches from one generation to the next, trapping individuals in a socioeconomic pit that is nearly impossible to ascend. Part of the fuel for poverty’s unending cycle is its suppressing effects on individuals’ cognitive development, executive functioning, and attention. Some facts about poverty include: nearly 22,000 children die each day due to living in poverty; Global poverty has decreased by half over the last decade, however, 71% of the population still live in low-income or poor conditions; and 30% of the world’s extremely poor live in India. Research substantiates the negative effects poverty can have on a child’s brain including development, learning and academic performance. Numerous studies have documented that low-income children, as young as age two, perform worse across cognitive measures [Duncan & Brooks-Gunn 1997: Feinsten 2003]. Poverty and inequality can be reduced by improving the analytical framework, analyzing the performance and results of specific programs and projects, as well as assessing and designing better public management systems.

gastric enzymes, to lessen irritation of the gastric mucosa, and to deliver drugs selectively to the site of absorption [94, 95]. Enteric coating materials are polymers, which have acid groups. In the acidic medium of the stomach the acid groups are nonionized, and the coating material is insoluble. Fast dissolution and drug release take place in the upper intestine as a function of pH change in the environment. The polymer acid groups are ionized at higher pH and the material dissolves [95].

Cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) was the first synthetic polymer described in 1937, which gained soon high popularity as a gastric resistant polymer.
Later polyvinyl acetate phthalate (PVAP) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HPMCP) were preferred, because of their lower permeability in the gastric fluid and improved stability against hydrolysis. Today the methacrylate copolymers Eudragit® L and S are two of the most widely used polymers for this purpose.

The drug release from the pH-sensitive nanoparticles follows certain mechanisms which include:
1- Drug burst releases when the nanoparticle carriers dissolve at specific pH conditions:
They usually exhibited burst release profiles because of the dissolution characters of the carriers; drug release from conventional nanoparticles was mainly by diffusion. For pH- sensitive nanoparticles, at low pH, the nanoparticles prepared from polycarboxylic acid were solid matrix encapsulating drug, little drug released. As they reach the small intestine, the pH changes from acidic to neutral (6–7.4), carboxylic acid groups deprotonated, the linear polymers dissolved and drugs released rapidly.

2- Drug releases when the polymers swell at specific pH conditions:
Another reason for drug release from nanoparticles was the swelling of the materials [96].
At low pH, the polymers, particularly cross-linked polymers, have a compact structure, which considerably decreased the porosity of the matrix. This caused a slower release of drug as a result of the greater resistance for diffusion of the drug out of the nanogel. However, at higher pH, the nanogel particles were in a swollen state with a higher porosity that favored the release of the drug because of the reduction in diffusion resistance.
3- The drug releases as a result of both polymer dissolution and swelling:
There was obscure boundary between drug dissolution and swelling for the carriers. Some nanoparticle systems might release drug through both the mechanisms. Li et al., 2006 [97] studied the release of insulin from chitosan–Eudragit L100-55 nanoparticles in vitro. The results proposed that at low pH, the nanoparticles were covered by Eudragit L100-55, little water permeated into the particles and when the pH value was elevated to 5.8, Eudragit L100-55 dissolved and water penetrated to the core of the particles. The particle size become larger as chitosan swelling and the higher porosity of chitosan caused rapid insulin release.

Depending on their characters, pH sensitive nanoparticles can be mainly divided into two types. One induces drug release at higher pH because of ionizable functional groups on the pol

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.