Classroom Participation

 

Address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.
Initial Response
Instructions:
Discussion post for this week, please take the following descriptive information and place it with the appropriate categories listed.
• Based on the descriptive information, would this be a focused or comprehensive assessment and, if focused, what system or systems would you want to assess and why?
Descriptions
• Presents with c/o headache
• Pain is a ‘4’ on a scale of 1-10
• Scoliosis corrected with Charleston brace, broken toe
• No cold/sinus symptoms
• Eye exam 2 years ago
• No medications, NKDA
• No hospitalizations
• No tobacco use, wine once monthly, no recreational drug use
• Single, lives alone
• Traveled to UK, Caribbean in past 3 months
• Throbbing for past 2 hours, can feel pulse in temple
• Sports-induced asthma
• No fever, no changes in vision
Categories
• Chief Complaint
• History of Present Illness
• Past Medical History
• Personal and Social History
• Review of Symptoms

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
• Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
• Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
• Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
• Present new references that support your opinions.

Sample Solution

This Global Management Project (GMP) is focused on two different international economic development methodologies, microfinance institutions (MFIs) and business incubators for economic development. This is in response to assumptions made by co-founders Mr. and Mrs. Jones (names have been substituted) and their long-standing interest in international development and poverty alleviation. The Jones’ believe that supporting formal above-board business creation and providing ongoing support through the means of a business incubator is more effective at addressing poverty than the approach taken by MFIs to support the informal market and consumption lending. They also believe that there is a market within the study abroad sector for using students and study abroad programs as a resource for international development. Based on these assumptions, the Jones’ wish to enter the study abroad industry and launch a new venture. This new venture, Global Riplz, is a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) incubator/accelerator whose mission statement is, “to establish Global Riplz as the premier solution for applied study abroad options for business students, bringing together great minds in an environment conducive to innovation while supporting local economic growth.”

As such, this GMP is being completed as a two-stage analysis for the successful strategic entry of this new venture and to answer the question, are economic incubators more or less effective than MFIs at addressing poverty through job creation? Stage one is literature review and discussion of MFIs and incubators for economic development. While, stage two of the analysis is to evaluate the external environment, the major competitors in the study abroad industry, current products offerings and to define the company’s internal environment through the development of a targeted marketing plan.

Introduction

From the 1970’s onwards a large number of MFIs got underway in Latin America. This was due primarily to US government funding and “the perceived need to provide the poor in Latin America with the hope of a way out of poverty” (Bateman, 2013, p. 12). By the 1990’s the microfinance model was thoroughly embedded within Latin America’s economies. Financial systems and resources were being shifted away from higher risk and less profitable applications such as registered SME development and into microfinance and consumption lending (Bateman, 2013). This shift in economic development policy sparked rapid rise in the informal sector in the 1990’s (Loar and Marquez, 1998).

After extensive experience working and traveling in Latin America, Mr. and Mrs. Jones have developed a long-standing interest in international development and poverty alleviation. They have developed a desire to launch a new venture that might be able to help address economic development and job creation. The founders have based the concept for this new venture on two major assumptions including, their belief that supporting formal above-board business creation and providing ongoing support is more ef

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.