Cloud computing to become multi-jurisdictional

For cloud computing to become multi-jurisdictional, it must be separated from politics.

 

 

Sample Solution

Cloud computing to become multi-jurisdictional

Cloud computing is the delivery of different services through the internet. It has managed to present numerous challenges of information policy such as privacy issues, reliability, together with regulation. There exists a wide range of policy issues which are related to cloud computing that tends to attract attention even as cloud computing consequently develops into a system that is widely used and depended upon by many (Kushida, K., Murray, J., & John, Z., 2014). Sometimes a cloud company could be located in the U.S. but has to provide the clouding services to a country in Asia. This would then be difficult more so when the policies in those countries differ. Sometimes political differences would be the case that drives this to the highest level possible, making it difficult for the public in that state to acquire the services of this particular cloud company. Politics, has to some extent, affected cloud computing. It will not help cloud computing platform to become multi-jurisdictional.

religious factors.
As argued by Almond and Verba, there is a certain “‘civic culture’ [which] is necessary for the establishment of democracy, and […] this sort of culture is not easy transferable to non-Western cultures”[15]. The widespread acceptance of state authority and obedience towards civic duties defines the nature of Western culture: for example, the “obeying [of] the laws of the country, paying the taxes levied by the government [or] serving in a jury or as a witness in court”[16]. Almond and Verba argue the Western “mix of parochial passivity and modern participant activism”[17] is only compatible with certain cultures, and could be a factor fixing countries in non-democratic regimes. Some of the most likely explanations for this are likely to be historical religious influences, particularly the influence of Protestantism in the early 17th century in Western Europe. Steve Bruce argues that “Protestantism has contributed to modern democracy [by] pioneering a particularly effective combination of individualism and community spirit”[18], and the differing cultures of historically Islamic cultures are perhaps strengthening the likelihood of non-democratic regimes’ survivals today.
As explained in the view of Sayyid Qutb, “Islam is irreconcilable with the main assumptions of democratic government, and therefore Islam and democracy are incompatible”[11]. This view is supported by Huntington, writing that “the nature of Islamic culture [is] inhospitable [to] democracy”[12], since “democracy clashes with the Islamic notion of the sovereignty of God [and means] taking power from the hands of its usurpers and restoring it to God alone”[11]. In this regard, we can see how Islamic countries may be less likely to democratise and thus be more rigidly stuck in an authoritarian regime; holding beliefs which perhaps do not align as well with democratic governments. It could be argued, for example, that Sharia Law can foster the unequal treatment of women, while it has made space for “a violent Islamic radical movement: Boko Haram, [which] proffers religious authoritarianism as an alternative to democracy”[13].

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.