Community and Public Health Nursing

 

Develop your position about the individual rights to control the spread of communicable diseases for the good of society.
· Survey the role of boards of health in your community and state to determine how communicable diseases are prevented and controlled.

 

Sample Solution

In spite of the so-called Epidemiological Transition, infectious diseases remain important as causes of morbidity, mortality and losses in productivity and economy in both developed nations as well as developing nations. The control of infectious diseases necessitates public health interventions that often infringe on the rights of individuals. This is unavoidable because such diseases can spread from the infected individual to other people, with the young, the elderly and the immune-compromised at higher risk. As such, it is necessary to have a clearer understanding of the ethical dilemmas involved in the respecting individual rights versus protection of the general public when it comes to the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, and control (or even eradication) of such diseases and their outbreaks.

association, because of the huge number of requirements on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), recommends that the viability of a gathering is subject to the administration styles of the pioneer and their favourability to the circumstance. A large part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored colleague scale (LPC). The LPC expects to measure a potential chiefs way to deal with an errand on a size of relationship roused to task spurred, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is happening to be reasoned, and in this manner permits the distinguishing proof of appropriate pioneers for undertakings. The favourableness of the circumstance relies upon three qualities: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the lucidity of the errand to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). In the event that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler’s possibility model offers an exceptionally grave categorisation of administration, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won’t bring about progress for a likely pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal construction inside an association the hypothesis can be applied openly, right off the bat because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted on the off chance that their LPC score doesn’t match that expected of the circumstance (Pettinger, 2007). Furthermore, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. Notwithstanding, further down the order Fielder’s possibility hypothesis starts to hold substantially less significance, it becomes unfeasible according to a hierarchical viewpoint because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of initiative. The strategies of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored collaborator is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.