The creative engagement with your community in order to promote thinking about it differently. The possibilities for what may be produced will be discussed with your OLA and peers in the Collaborate session and discussions and may vary in form.
This assignment supports unit learning outcomes 2 and 4.
Assignment details
The emphasis is on using alternatives to traditional written products such as essays and reports to produce a visual artifact or product that represents the essence of your community. Poetry, song, video/film, community radio features, art, artifacts (things/objects): these are all examples of creative products that could be submitted, but this is not an exclusive list. How these things will be marked will also be discussed in Collaborate sessions and discussion boards as the format will be negotiable. The emphasis will be on how well the product communicates the connection to the community.
Key questions for this assignment will be:
• How well does this tell the story of me in my community?
• How does it communicate critical reflection on my role in the community?
• Does it represent a thoughtful and substantial effort to address these questions?
Assignment criteria
1. How well does this tell the story of me in the community?
2. How does it communicate critical reflection on my role in the community?
3. Does it represent a thoughtful and substantial effort to address these questions?
Your work will be assessed using the following marking guide:
“Shilpa Gupta’s creative technique is significantly more than narrowing the separation among buyer and item, (she uncovered) the basic holes among source and goal” (Axel Roch, 2006), taking into consideration the assessment of our situation as people in todays progressively industrialist world. Gupta’s establishment capriciously clouds the limits between the watcher and the work, by giving obligation to the member to picked and tweak their own kidney made of sugar and gelatine in her road shop. Her utilization of the basic elements of sugar and gelatine to make the kidneys, conceals the unpredictability and outrage of the human condition taking into account a firmer handle on the way that people are just creatures and exist as an intricate animal types, that ought to be comprehended as an all inclusive populace as opposed to distinct people. She has embellished the store with lively pink stickers that mark it, “Your Kidney Supermarket”, like those of a boutique. She stands out this from bleak green inside flood lighting, ingraining a feeling of vulnerability that takes care of into the very control of this illicit exchange. The benefactor takes part in the experience of altering their own kidney to suit their requirements. There is a decision of size, shading and even exchange course, which are exhibited by shallow and energizing infographics. This customisation, explains the developing straightforwardness and spread of bio-robbery, yet additionally lights up the possibility that being human can be deconstructed and separated into trifling parts, along these lines pulverizing any goals of sex, race, sexuality through science. These bogus kidneys are shown in acrylic cases suspended by red jam like renal conduits. The store additionally offers a remove administration whereby the member can make their own modifiable kidneys at home. Behind the show instance of palatable renal frameworks, she has situated a couch inverse a little retro TV that replays an instructional video. The member is entranced by the perception and procedure of financially abusing a normally happening highlight of the human body. This investigation of the human condition raises that any orders put upon an individual are liquid, and can be changed or built at the desire of the individual, and that such titles are unnecessary in the midst of the acknowledgment that a person is a feature of nature, a species among itself.