Company mergers are very busy and challenging times for corporate leadership

 

Company mergers are very busy and challenging times for corporate leadership. The role that HR plays during a merger is often complex and far reaching. In this assignment, you write an executive brief that considers aspects of how an HR department might prioritize and operate to support the union of two companies.
Preparation
How to Brief an Executive
There is no single correct way to brief an executive or other stakeholder. The final deliverable is your choice, but effective briefs have common elements; they should be clear, concise, relevant, well-structured, and provide decision-making information. Here are a couple of resources you may use to get started:
• How to Brief an Executive: A podcast from the Communications Guys.
• How to Write a Formal Business Report (With Examples): Hints from Indeed.
Scenario
Imagine that Anchor Hospital, a 250-bed medical center, is merging with the similar-sized Saint Mary’s Hospital to better serve the needs of their metropolitan community. An administrative board has been formed to guide all aspects of the merger. They have asked all departments to submit an executive brief that states their roles, intended model of operations, and initial steps to build interdepartmental relationships.
The board’s primary concern for HR is how it will manage the merging of the workforces into a single, cohesive, and effective team. They want to understand HR’s primary role, guiding principles, and application of current practice. Specifically, they want your vision for the following:
• A merger-related current best practice or trend that is being successfully employed by HR departments.
• HR’s primary role in assimilating the workforces for the two hospitals.
• The HR management model to be followed.
• How to foster relationships between HR and department managers.
Instructions
Write a 2-3 page executive brief that address the following merger-related items:
1 Recommend a relevant HR trend or practice that would be useful to consider as part of this merger. Justify your recommendation.
2 Analyze HR’s primary role(s) as a strategic corporate partner in merging the workforces of the organizations.
3 Recommend an HRM model that would effectively steer the joining of each organization’s employees into a single, cohesive workforce. Justify your recommendation.
4 Recommend two initial steps that HR should initiate to develop an effective relationship between HR and management. Justify your recommendation.
Additional Requirements
• Resources: Use four sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
• SWS: This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
• Determine strategies for HR operations including defining organizational roles and relations with leadership.

 

Sample Solution

Navigating a merger can be difficult for a company or a key stakeholder involved. However, by embracing change and demonstrating strong leadership at this critical time, you can increase employee involvement and make the merger a true success. Let’s look at how to embrace change and what successful managers are producing in the organization during mergers and acquisitions, especially to keep teams involved during these uncertain times. For many with experience in this area, when asked about 95% of executives to “list the cultural suitability essential to successful integration,” 25% fail integration efforts. The main reasons are cultural cohesion and inconsistency. “

e three premises of first form reject the idea of an all-PKG God as one and codependence. Moreover, these premises utilize good rationale which suggests this case verifiably legitimate. In this way, to distort the allowance and finish of these three premises, any of the three premises should be dismissed . The primary reason is viewed as the meaning of God by many. On the off chance that it is to be sure the meaning of God, dismissing it would intend to dismiss the thought that God exists. Notwithstanding, on the off chance that we see it as a hypothesis rather than a severe definition, it would intend to dismiss the thought of God being all-PKG not His reality completely . For instance, as per dismissing the main reason, Greeks didn’t trust their Gods to be almighty. Manichaeism and Zoroastrian religions likewise don’t hold the conviction of an almighty God. Yet, even by dismissing first reason as a hypothesis, the mystical ideas and convictions of numerous religions who consider God as the Almighty and Omnipotent are disturbed.

B. Dismissing the Third Premise

Assuming that we reject the third reason it would intend to dismiss the presence of malevolence. The contention from evil depicts evil to have two sorts; regular and human-controlled . Normal evil oversees the experiencing incurred upon humankind by cataclysmic events like quakes, volcanic emissions and waves and so on Human controlled insidious alludes to the affliction and wretchedness incurred by people on people. For instance, the torment the Jews were exposed to by the Nazi Regime in the subsequent universal conflict or the torments incurred upon the poor by increasing government rates and expansion. Dismissing the third reason is just conceivable assuming that one chose to disregard all the experiencing on the planet. Enduring isn’t an apparent thing by the eyes, it is seen by the heart and to overlook it would mean being cutthroat. It’s feasible to dismiss the third reason assuming we saw the world as unbiased and apathetic regarding ethical quality . In the event that the world were without feeling and sentiments, just would one be able to keep the presence from getting abhorrent. In any case, evil is certifiably not a theoretical element. The sufferings of people are substantial proof to the presence of malicious which makes it insensitive to dismiss the third reason.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.