Comparing Reading Assessments Matrix

Using the topic Resources and your own research, complete the “Comparing Reading Assessments Matrix.”

Part 2: The Importance of Assessments

In 250-500 words, reflect on the following.

Consider your own professional practice and describe how you assess and support reading within your content area, including discussion of reading assessments, if you use them.
Based upon what you learned from your research, explain which of the assessments from the matrix would be most beneficial and useful to you as a teacher and explain why. Include discussion about how you would ensure you were properly trained to use the tool, when you would use the tool, and how you would collect, organize, and use the assessment data.
Explain why it is important for all teachers, regardless of content area, to be aware of reading assessments they can use with their students. Provide real-world examples to support your ideas.
Part 3: Interpreting Assessment Data Results

Review the topic Resources. Using the “Dyslexia Evaluation Report For English-Speaking Students (Non-ELLS)” analyze the reading assessment data presented in the document.

In 500-750 words, discuss the following:

Summarize overall student progress.
Interpret the data to determine whether Daisy is responding adequately to Tier 2 instruction. Discuss data that could potentially indicate signs of dyslexia.
Explain why the support team members disagree about what tier of instruction would best meet Daisy’s needs and justify your answer.
Describe the tier of instruction you would recommend for Daisy: Tier 1 instruction only, another round of Tier 2 instruction, or intensive Tier 3 instruction. Explain your answer.
Identify and explain the specific data points that were analyzed and summarize your findings.
Discuss how you will use this data to plan whole group instruction.
Explain specific interventions you will employ to assist students who are struggling with dyslexia or reading difficulties.

Sample Solution

This leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill ‘to shelter the innocent from harm…punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as ‘we may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldn’t this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: ‘it is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).’

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.