Comparing two different philosophers’ ideas on the self.

 

 

 

In this assignment, you will be asked to show that you can summarize and then compare two different philosophers’ ideas on the self. The issue of how we understand what the self is, and how it relates to our memory or our physical body and brain, is a recurring issue in philosophy.

This assignment supports the following unit objectives:

Compare and contrast a soul-based theory of the self (as illustrated by Descartes) with a psychological-based theory of the self (like that of Locke) and a skeptical view of the self (like that of Hume).
Articulate how memory relates to our definition of the self.
Articulate the identity theory of Locke.
Explain the connection between personhood and “consciousness” as articulated by Locke.
Compare Descartes and Locke’s views on personhood and guilt.

 

 

Sample Solution

Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Plato (c.428 – 347 BC) are two of history’s most significant philosophers. Socrates was also regarded as a renowned philosopher, and Plato was highly affected by his teachings as his pupil. Plato then became Aristotle’s teacher, who, despite being a long-term student, was able to identify many flaws in Plato’s views and became a harsh critic of his teacher. Despite his critiques, Aristotle was influenced by Plato, which makes their works, which address the same philosophical issues, clearly comparable. Plato and Aristotle both built their theories on four common beliefs:

 

 

Contrasts Between Conventional and Alternative Medicine

GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation

AlternativeDoctorThe progress of science is generally accepted to have improved the nature of numerous procedures, items, and administrations. Be that as it may, in specific circles of life, customary strategies are as yet being utilized; medication is a splendid case of the concurrence of two antipodal methodologies. Alongside ordinarily perceived regular medication dependent on science and innovation, there likewise exists elective medication, which once in a while incorporates rehearses created a large number of years back. The predominance of every one of these sorts of medication have a long-standing history, as every one of them have demonstrated its adequacy; thusly, understanding their favorable circumstances and downsides is urgent for framing one’s own perspective.

The main contrast between these two frameworks is their way to deal with analysis. Traditional medication centers around the components that cause sicknesses and helping their manifestations; each variation from the norm is viewed as a free proviso, separate from the character of an individual and their condition. In contrast to its partner, elective medication considers a to be as a harmony of interrelations between a body and its condition; in this way, an ailment is believed to be brought about by a lopsidedness between them. At the end of the day, elective medication centers preferably around purging the whole framework over on restoring its specific components (Buzzle).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.