Concepts and Applications


Many TV shows depict law enforcement personnel accessing readily accessible databases that contain all types of records about individuals –records about everything from address to telephone records to finances, insurance, and criminal history. The information you share with your bank, doctor, insurance agent, the TSA, ancestry kit companies, and on social media can make your life an open book. Here are some questions to address as you reflect on this:

1. Are you comfortable with giving away some of your privacy for increased security? Why or why not? How far would you let the government go in examining people’s private lives?
2. How much access should we have to certain aspects of others’ private lives? For example, should States share criminal databases? But should a database of people paroled or released for crimes be made public? Why or why not?


Sample Solution

Concepts and Applications

It is the 21st century, and everyone is online. Our personal information is digitized and available to anyone with the means to access it, but should we give up our right to personal privacy in return for greater security? Privacy and security refer to two concerns of individuals within a society. Privacy refers to the protection of a person and her or his information, such as from government invasion. Security refers to protection against attacks, such as those by criminals or terrorists. Both rights are crucial, but often come at each other`s expense. People are not comfortable with giving away some of their privacy for increased security because the government`s use of “National Security” isn’t always about increasing security. It has been used in the past as a comfortable way to avoid transparency, leading to the loss of basic human rights.

The article, Coach-Athlete Communication: Coaching Style, Leadership Characteristics, and Psychological Outcomes, shows the importance of coaches to be able to form healthy relationships with their players. The reason as to why creating a healthy relationship is so that players feel a sense of closeness and improve their perception of the coach. Effective communication between all individuals involved can help the satisfaction of the training and much more just by achieving proper communication tactics. This article explains different theories such as Self-Determination Theory and the Multi-Dimensional Model of Leadership Theory, and how they relate to the art of coaching. When the theories are examined and explained, people are then put into categories of the models, which are then broken down to see who falls into which theory. Within the article the author explains to readers that however a message is received by players all depends on the open, and trustworthy relationship that the coach and player have formed. The author has clearly depicted ways to successfully achieve proper communication with players, and also includes examples of negative communication that can be detrimental to healthy relationships.


The article is beneficial in regards to learning as to what theories fall into the category of coaching and what communication strategies are most beneficial over others. The authors research is really great and gives the reader different examples that dive into the said theory that they are talking about, which helps the reader connect with the text.


West, LaShell (2016), Coach-Athlete Communication: Coaching Style, Leadership Characteristics, and Psychological Outcomes, Scholar works @BGSU, 1-71,

Key Words: Multi-Dimensional Model, Self Determination Theory, Trustworthy, Effective Communication, Satisfaction
The Impact of Leadership Behavior on Satisfaction of College Tennis Players: A Test of the Leadership Behavior Congruency Hypothesis of the Multidimensional Model of Leadership:
The article focuses on the importance of a coaches behavior and the impact their behavior has on their players. The Multidimensional Model of Leadership alludes that the leaders behavior can influence group performance and member satisfaction. A certain way a coach presents him or herself to their players can have control on how the players will receive the information. The article talks about research that researches completed on 148 collegiate tennis players around the country but their findings were inconclusive. Researchers proceeded with the data that they knew and proceeded the research with DI, DII, and DIII coaches and their players. The total coaching tally was 1025 people which received surveys to complete to answer questions about their relationship with their coaches. The data showed different categories of people that responded more often and how many answered a certain way. The research foun