In RES-815 you selected five empirical articles to begin working on your proposed dissertation topic. For this assignment you will select 10 new empirical articles on your proposed dissertation topic to annotate and then to complete a reflection section.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Locate the “Dissertation Development Template” in the topic Resources for this topic.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA 7th style for their writing assignments.
Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
Directions:
Use the Dissertation Development Template to annotate 10 new empirical articles for your proposed dissertation topic.
Complete the reflection section that follows the annotated bibliography in the template to do the following:
State how the potential topic aligns with your program of study.
Justify the feasibility of the intended study.
Write a problem statement for your proposed study using the guidelines in the template.
Briefly defend the need for the proposed study.
Propose a conceptual/theoretical framework for the intended study.
Reflect on the significance of the proposed study.
Defend your selection of articles and annotations.
ve longitudinal review with 175 kids between mean periods of 6.10 and 12.18, analysts evaluated compassion, moral thinking, and culpability as impacts on participation, aiding, and partaking in a companion climate. The outcomes show that compassion predicts aiding, participation, and sharing; moral thinking and culpability trouble additionally connect with compassion to foresee aiding and collaboration. Both compassion and responsibility pity were connected to the advancement of sharing. The review grows past exploration on moral feelings and moral thinking being developed of different prosocial practices (for example participation, helping, sharing) across center youth, and gives understanding on the way that these feelings can interface to mutually direct a youngster’s conduct in a friend experience. Once more, this study is extensively later and similarly also distributed in a broadly regarded peer-checked on diary for youngster brain research: Child Development. Provisos to the validity of this study are the work of a sketchy scale for estimating compassion factors (the IPPA), just as the nearly little example size (just 175 youngsters). In any case, the review’s discoveries on the significance of different elements (like the hesitant feeling of responsibility) in the connection among compassion and prosocial practices will demonstrate exceptionally applicable to my White Paper’s conversation of companion collaborations and the youngster’s interior experience. This article interfaces very well with my other exploration on reluctant feelings; related, these sources give a more grounded comprehension of the inward experience a youngster goes through in specific social conditions and circumstances.