Conducting QUANTITATIVE Research

 

 

Outline the following steps for conducting QUANTITATIVE Research:

Describe the Research Problem and Questions
Describe the Review of Literature
Explain the design
Outline the sample selection

Sample Solution

Conducting Quantitative Research

In the scientific paradigm, quantitative research involves the systematic investigation of observable phenomena in order to explain and predict behaviors, often with the goal to identify patterns of behavior. Researchers conduct quantitative research to establish a relationship between one variable and the other, in other words, the independent and the dependent variables. It is critical that objectivity is maintained throughout a quantitative research. The data that comes from quantitative research are numerical in form and often take the form of explaining the frequency, degree, value, and/or intensity of a variable. This paper explains the steps in conducting research within the quantitative paradigm, which include theory, hypothesis, research design, and measures.

ords, this sort of government esteems the assistants more than others. The rulers in this administration are not picked by their intelligent person/philosophical means like in a privileged, yet rather they gain power through their victories and accomplishment of respects. Subject to their authority, individuals will adhere to guidelines forcibly. Individuals will want material riches, having a tendency to be gluttonous. Because of these conditions, Socrates sees this kind of government as being sub-par compared to a privileged, where individuals in a perfect world have restraint and practice balance. In the wake of going through a timocracy, they will go through a government; this framework will remember more aggregation and squandering of cash for the high society, while the lower class is without a doubt poor and make up most of the populace. The oligarchs live to enjoy and enhance themselves and satisfy their own longings. These couple of men approach political and military power, while poor people classmen are totally weak. The high society likes it as such. Accordingly, their military is feeble in general on the grounds that the rich are hesitant to give weapons to poor people, feeling that they will rebel against them. Then, there is a majority rules system: a type of government where there is opportunity to act anyway you wish to. The vote based man’s main concern is the material things that he can purchase with cash. Finally, there is the most terrible type of government in Socrates’ eyes. There is no discipline, equity, control, and practically no regulations. Society essentially lives in bedlam; individuals do however they see fit it incorporates insidious exercises like homicide. Socrates accepts that there is no happiness in a dictator, in light of the fact that with this administration, one can get whatever he/she wishes, which makes it not palatable to accomplish anything. This will be the end, in which individuals fear everything and everybody, including themselves. Astuteness and reason are nonexistent.

Actually, I feel that Socrates made this ideal city while realizing that it was out of reach since he needs for there to be an objective that individuals can pursue consistently. It provides individuals a motivation, to attempt to be better individuals and know about how they play a part in their general public. He shows that for every person, it is to their greatest advantage to endeavor carrying on with a fair life. Through equity, he accepted that individuals can accomplish opportunity, joy and the

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.