Conflict Resolution Tactics to Avoid

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

Article: https://www.verywellmind.com/conflict-resolution-mistakes-to-avoid-3144982

Read the article above and answer the following questions:

1. Which of the 10 tactics described in the article have you witnessed the most in conflicts you have experienced? Describe the tactics and why they are not helpful in conflict resolution.

2. Identify at least one of the 10 tactics described in the article that you engage in the most (meaning you engaged in these tactics on your end of the conflict). Define this tactic and describe why it is not helpful in conflict resolution.

3. List one example for how EACH of the 10 tactics to avoid would look in an active conflict. Ex: Overgeneralizing – I address my coworker for ALWAYS showing up late for shift report.

4. For EACH of the 10 tactics to avoid, describe a better strategy you could use to avoid exacerbating a conflict. Ex: Overgeneralizing – I would specifically address my coworker on the 3 recent times he/she was late for shift report without saying ALWAYS.

5. Choose one of the 10 tactics to avoid and describe how you would handle someone who is using that tactic on you during a conflict.

Sample Solution

I have witnessed the most the “avoidance” tactic in conflicts I have experienced. This involves one or both parties avoiding to address the issue at hand which can be done through a variety of ways such as leaving the room, changing subject, or even outright refusal to discuss it further (Verywellmind 2021). The main problem with this approach is that it does nothing to help resolve the underlying conflict and only serves to prolong an already difficult situation. It also prevents any meaningful exchange from taking place as no issues are actually being addressed leading to both parties feeling more frustrated and confused than before. In order for effective communication and understanding between two individuals, each party must listen actively while also providing constructive feedback so that all concerns are addressed in a timely manner (Hoffman & Foster 2019).

Furthermore, another tactic I have observed is “hostile aggression” where one person will use aggressive language or behavior towards another which often results in resentment or defensiveness among those involved (Verywellmind 2021). This is not helpful for resolving conflict as it typically leads to a breakdown of trust between the two parties due its volatile nature. Not only can this be damaging on an emotional level but it could also escalate quickly into a physical altercation if left unchecked – thus making things worse rather than better. To prevent hostile aggression from occurring during conflict resolution sessions there should always be mutual respect among all participants as well as clear guidelines set out beforehand so everyone knows what kind of behavior is expected when addressing certain topics.

In conclusion, although conflicts may arise unavoidably within different settings – whether personally or professionally – by keeping these tactics in mind we can help ensure that they do not hinder our ability to come together peacefully and rationally discuss matters at hand thereby leading us towards mutually beneficial outcomes.

um of at least nine months has to elapse since the initial injury, and there should be no signs of healing for the final three months for the diagnosis of fracture nonunion. There are a few different classification systems of nonunions, but nonunions are most commonly divided into two categories of hypervascular nonunion and avascular nonunion. In hypervascular nonunions, also known as hypertrophic nonunion, fracture ends are vascular and are capable of biological activity. Here is evidence of callus formation around the fracture site and it is thought to be in response to excessive micromotion at the fracture site. Avascular nonunions, also known as atrophic nonunion, are caused by avascularity, or inadequate blood supply of the fracture ends. There is no or minimal callus formation, and fracture line remains visible . is nonunion requires natural enhancement in addition to adequate immobilisation to heal.

Treatment of mandibular aims in achieving the bony union, right occlusion, preserve IAN and mental nerve function, to prevent malunion and to attain optimal cosmesis. Rigid plate and screw fixation have the advantage of allowing the patient to return to the role without the need of 4–6 weeks of IMF; but the success of rigid fixation depends upon accurate reduction. During adaptation of manipulating in a champys line of osteosynthesis in symphysis region, even main bar applied to the tooth for proper occlusion, but still, the bone fragments overlap bone prominence. Gaps will be present. To achieve bone contact for healing various method are devices for the same to hold the fracture segments together like Towel clamps, Modified towel clamps. Stress patterns generated by Synthes reduction forceps, orthodontic brackets, allis forceps, manual reduction, elastics internal traction reduction, bone holding forceps, tension wire method and vacuum splints, as without which there is always a gap and inability to fix using mini plate intraoperatively. Proper alignment and reduction are essential for mastication, speech, and normal range of oral motion.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer