Conformity And Deviance

Social psychologist Irving Janis coined the term groupthink to describe how people often respond differently in a group context than they might if they were alone. Another interesting topic of sociological study is the area of deviance and social control. The textbook provides multiples examples from history where groupthink may have influenced people to participate in socially deviant behavior that they might have otherwise avoided.

For the initial post, respond to one of the following options, and label the beginning of your post indicating either Option 1 or Option 2:

Option 1: Share an example from your personal experience (of your own or of someone you know), or an example from history, where groupthink may have influenced people to behave or arrive at a decision in a way that many individual members privately might have avoided or thought unwise.
Option 2: Complete an observation: In a safe environment, perhaps around family or friends, select one of the social norm violations below to conduct in a social experiment:
Take food off of someone else’s plate
Constantly interrupt when someone else is talking
Stand really close to someone when talking with them
When you are done, be sure to tell them what you were doing!

Describe the person’s interaction as you were acting against traditional social norms. After you explain what you were doing, ask them how they felt when you were acting in a way contrary to traditionally forms of accepted behavior. Examine how this social experiment helps us explore why society views certain behaviors as deviant and whether perceptions of that behavior have changed over time. Determine and explain which theory of deviance you think works best for understanding the deviant behavior you have chosen to discuss. Remember to be respectful in light of potentially sensitive topics, and consider what you might be disclosing, as there is no guarantee of privacy.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

I was in a group project in college with three other students. We were all assigned to write a paper on the same topic, but we were given a lot of freedom to decide how we wanted to approach the project. We decided to meet every week to discuss our progress and to make sure that we were all on the same page.

At first, the meetings were productive. We would discuss our ideas and share our research. However, as the project went on, the meetings started to become more and more polarized. Two of the students in the group were very opinionated, and they would often argue with each other about the best way to approach the paper. The third student and I were more moderate, and we would often try to mediate the arguments.

One day, we were in the middle of a particularly heated argument when I realized that something was wrong. The two opinionated students were so focused on winning the argument that they weren’t even listening to what the third student and I were saying. They were just repeating their own points over and over again.

I realized that this was a classic example of groupthink. The two opinionated students had become so caught up in the group’s decision-making process that they were no longer able to think critically. They were only interested in winning the argument, even if it meant ignoring the evidence.

I tried to talk to the two students about this, but they wouldn’t listen. They were convinced that they were right, and they didn’t want to hear any other opinions. In the end, we ended up submitting a paper that was not as good as it could have been.

This experience taught me a valuable lesson about groupthink. When people are in a group, they can often be influenced to make decisions that they would not make if they were alone. This is because people in groups are more likely to conform to the group’s norms and to avoid rocking the boat.

It is important to be aware of groupthink and to be able to identify it when it is happening. If you find yourself in a group that is exhibiting signs of groupthink, it is important to speak up and to challenge the group’s assumptions. You may not be able to change the group’s decision, but you can at least try to make sure that the decision is made in a thoughtful and informed way.

Option 2: Discuss the potential negative consequences of groupthink.

Groupthink can have a number of negative consequences, including:

  • Poor decision-making: When people are in a group, they are more likely to make decisions that are based on emotion rather than on logic. This is because people in groups are more likely to conform to the group’s norms and to avoid rocking the boat.
  • Failure to consider alternative viewpoints: Groupthink can lead to a failure to consider alternative viewpoints. This is because people in groups are more likely to focus on the group’s consensus and to ignore dissenting opinions.
  • Suppression of dissent: Groupthink can lead to the suppression of dissent. This is because people in groups are more likely to pressure dissenters to conform to the group’s norms.
  • Increased risk of accidents and disasters: Groupthink can increase the risk of accidents and disasters. This is because people in groups are more likely to take risks and to ignore warning signs.

It is important to be aware of the potential negative consequences of groupthink and to take steps to prevent it. This can be done by encouraging open discussion and debate within groups, by valuing dissenting opinions, and by creating a culture of critical thinking.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.